[FOXNEWS] Rep. Mike Rogers, chairman of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, said Sunday that President B.O.'s inertia on whether to launch Arclight airstrikes on Islamic State targets in Syria is part of an overall foreign policy failure that is empowering China, North Korea, Russia and other rival nations.
"It's all related," Rogers, R-Mich., told "Fox News Sunday." "The world sees the United States as withdrawn."
Rogers said the president's apparent disengagement or slow response is the reason China has engaged U.S. pilots and Russian President Vladimir Putin ...Second and fourth President and sixth of the Russian Federation and the first to remain sober. Putin is credited with bringing political stability and re-establishing something like the rule of law, which occasionally results in somebody dropping dead from polonium poisoning. Under Putin, a new group of business magnates controlling significant swathes of Russia's economy has emerged, all of whom have close personal ties to Putin. The old bunch, without close personal ties to Putin, are in jail or in exile or dead... has moved into eastern Ukraine without fear of consequence.
"U.S. foreign policy is in free fall," he said. "Traditional allies are saying maybe the United States is not the best to lead us."
The president faces a big test later this week when he travels to Europe for a NATO ...the North Atlantic Treaty Organization. A cautionary tale of cost-benefit analysis.... summit where he hopes to build a coalition to stop Islamic State, the terror group formerly known as ISIS, and other murderous Moslem groups in the Middle East.
Rogers told Fox News he doesn't believe White House Press Secretary Josh Ernest when he said last week that military options are "still being developed."
Posted by: Fred ||
09/01/2014 00:00 ||
Comments ||
Link ||
[2 views]
Top|| File under: Islamic State
#1
Rogers told Fox News he doesn't believe White House Press Secretary Josh Ernest when he said last week that military options are "still being developed."
In defense of Ernest, military options are constantly being refined, developed, and reviewed. It's part of an ongoing process. In my opinion, Rogers bears close watching.
Posted by: Frank G ||
09/01/2014 10:09 Comments ||
Top||
#3
Isn't he doing a talk-radio show after he's out next year? Kind of odd - HPSCI chmn to radio host. Cannot recall his explanation for gettin' out.
Kind of striking - well, any more nothing is surprising, esp. on the down-side - that one of only lonely voices speaking obvious critical truths on matters of supreme national importance is a retiring, obscure House chairman.
The country has changed in ways that make it unrecognizable, and not just in the many obvious (negative) ways most of us think of right away. This vacuum of even partisan opposition leadership, amidst a national decline unseen in our history, is one more ....
#4
Kind of striking - well, any more nothing is surprising, esp. on the down-side - that one of only lonely voices speaking obvious critical truths on matters of supreme national importance is a retiring, obscure House chairman. Verlaine
Striking indeed, ....on both counts. While I adjust me tinfoil hat chinstrap, IMA awaiting bits on new information on the Blue Mountain - Aegis Security [Ms. Rogers] Benghazi connection.
Through regular channels, of course!
With U.S. bombs sprinkling raining down from the sky, Shiite militia fighters aligned with Iran battled Sunni extremists during the weekend, punching through their defenses to break the weeks-long siege of Amerli, a cluster of farming villages whose Shiite residents faced almost-certain possible slaughter.
The fight in northern Iraq appeared to be the first in which U.S. warplanes and militias backed by Iran had worked with a common purpose on a battlefield against militants from the Islamic State, even though the Obama administration said there was no direct coordination with the militias. A common purpose, with Iran. And you said Champ was dumb!
Should such military actions continue, they could mark a dramatic shift for the United States and Iran, which have long vied for control in Iraq. Except the U.S. gave up its 'control' in 2011. The twit probably thinks that was subterfuge.
They could also align the interests of the Obamanaughts Americans with those of their longtime sworn enemies in the Iranian-supported Shiite militias, whose fighters killed many U.S. soldiers during the long occupation of Iraq. What do you call U.S. military in Europe, Author? What about Korea?
The latest expansion of U.S. military operations reflects how seriously the situation in Iraq has deteriorated since the Iranian-backed withdrawal of U.S. forces in 2011. But any decision to support the Shiite militias, who have proven more adept than the U.S.-trained Iraqi army, would come with its own challenges. Overlooking the Sunnis switched sides, having nothing to do with their U.S. training. In fact, some of the U.S. training is likely now supporting the Forces of Evil.
The militants from the Islamic State were able to storm into Iraq in recent months in part because Sunnis felt so disenfranchised by the Shiite-led government of former Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki. If the United States is seen to be strengthening the hand of militias that terrorized Sunnis during the sectarian war of 2006 and 2007, the minority Sunnis might balk at participating in America's long-term goal of establishing a unity government. More and more, I support the broken-clock-is-right-twice-a-day Biden Partition Plan.
Or, in a worst-case scenario, more Sunnis could align with Islamic State fighters. Really?
David Petraeus, a former top U.S. military commander in Iraq who led the U.S. troop surge in 2007, has warned against such possibilities as the Obama administration, reeling from the fall of Iraq's second-largest city, Mosul, weighed military action against the Islamic State. That ain't the only thing Champ's administration is reeling from.
"This cannot be the United States being the air force for Shia militias or a Shia-on-Sunni Arab fight," he said at a security conference in London in June. "It has to be a fight of all of Iraq against extremists, who do happen to be Sunni Arabs."
The United States was careful to note Sunday that it was working in Amerli with its allies: regular Iraqi army units and Kurdish security forces, which the U.S. has been supporting with air power since President Barack Obama authorized airstrikes several weeks ago.
"Any coordinating with the Shiite militias was not done by us -- it would have been done by the ISF," a senior administration official said. But it is well known that the Shiite militias have been fighting alongside the army in recent months as the threat from the Islamic State became clear.
For Shiite Iran, the rise of the Islamic State -- and its aim of creating a Sunni caliphate in the region -- was alarming because of the possible threat to Iran itself. The militants' sudden successes also posed a more immediate threat of further destabilizing Iraq and Syria, countries that have been close to Tehran and helped it extend its power in the region. Now Iraq is an Iranian-influenced satellite? When did that happen? Right after the occupation ended?
In a reflection of the region's increasingly tangled politics, the Obama administration is finally considering taking the fight against the Islamic State to Syria.
The United States and Iran have opposite goals there: Iran has been an important supporter of President Bashar Assad, while the United States has sought his ouster by supporting moderate rebels. Don't "goals" suggest a strategy? And "support" suggests more than cheerleading>
But any U.S. military action against the Islamic State in Syria could end up bolstering Assad -- and furthering Iran's regional agenda. The circle is now complete.
The Obama administration has tried to avoid being seen as taking sides in a sectarian war, because the Shiite militias are especially feared by Iraq's Sunni population. When did the Sunnis become powerless against the mighty Shiites, I wonder?
But for one day at least, the realities on the ground appeared to override any concerns of effectively supporting the militias. A conclusion so meaningless, I just had to leave it in.
Posted by: Bobby ||
09/01/2014 09:43 ||
Comments ||
Link ||
[5 views]
Top|| File under:
As a OWG Globalist, the Bammer PCorrectly-Deniably wants Iran to assert itself as the Principal-Leader = US-style OWG Co-Superpower, or one of them, in future desired Persian Gulf Union, Middle East Union, Islamic/Muslim Union, Shia? Union, .... @etc.
Is there a BAMMER. GLOBIE-DESIRED ONE OR MORE SUNNI, PRO-IRAN? NEUTRALIST? EQUIVALENT TO CO-SUPERPOWER IRAN???
A multi-volume chronology and reference guide set detailing three years of the Mexican Drug War between 2010 and 2012.
Rantburg.com and borderlandbeat.com correspondent and author Chris Covert presents his first non-fiction work detailing
the drug and gang related violence in Mexico.
Chris gives us Mexican press dispatches of drug and gang war violence
over three years, presented in a multi volume set intended to chronicle the death, violence and mayhem which has
dominated Mexico for six years.
Rantburg was assembled from recycled algorithms in the United States of America. No
trees were destroyed in the production of this weblog. We did hurt some, though. Sorry.
...Second and fourth President and sixth of the Russian Federation and the first to remain sober. Putin is credited with bringing political stability and re-establishing something like the rule of law, which occasionally results in somebody dropping dead from polonium poisoning. Under Putin, a new group of business magnates controlling significant swathes of Russia's economy has emerged, all of whom have close personal ties to Putin. The old bunch, without close personal ties to Putin, are in jail or in exile or dead...
