|
First Strike?
Is Sammy this stupid? Last time he did everything wrong.U.S. Military Concerned Saddam Hussein May Launch First Attack U.S. officials fear that once President Bush signals the U.S. is headed to war, Saddam Hussein will strike pre-emptively, administration sources told ABCNEWS. But if the United States takes action to stop an Iraqi first strike, especially if they try to seize and protect the oil fields, U.S. officials admit they may end up starting the war itself. Weren't we going to do that anyway? This new level of concern about Iraq is caused by an accumulation of intelligence including troubling new details that focus on three areas: Specific new evidence indicates that Iraqi activity in the Western desert shows the strong likelihood Scud missiles are hidden there. These missiles could easily reach Israel carrying chemical or biological warheads which could draw Israel into any war. But Blixie says... oh, never mind. Detailed new intelligence from the southern Iraqi oil fields shows that many of the 700 wells have now been wired with explosives. These explosives appear to be connected to a central command post, so Saddam could easily set the wells ablaze. So if you take out the central CP nothing gets blown up, right? That's dumb. Near the border with Kuwait, where 135,000 U.S. troops are now stationed, recent surveillance indicates Iraqi artillery batteries have been moved dangerously close. The artillery is capable of firing shells filled with poison gas. What't the lifespan of an Iraqi artilleryman expected to be in this thing? About 15 minutes? Less? The United States is now considering moving against all three of these targets before any war begins in an effort to prevent Saddam from acting first, sources told ABCNEWS. I would think if you make your move on any of these things, the war will be considered "started". Posted by: tu3031 2003-03-14 |
| http://www.rantburg.com/poparticle.php?ID=11290 |