E-MAIL THIS LINK
To: 

Give Pakistan civilian nuclear technology! Or Else!
Daily Times Editorial. Typical Pakistani attitude - a bizarre and fanciful sense of equality with India and the tactic of negotiating with a gun to its head - "Sale of dangerous nuclear weapons technology is possible at all times when a state is under an economic crunch"

EDITORIAL: Give Pakistan civilian nuclear technology!

Pakistan’s ambassador to the United States, General (retd) Jehangir Karamat, said in Washington that Pakistan “should have the same access to US civilian nuclear technology that President Bush has proposed for India”. He then went on to take exception to the Indo-US defence pact that will tilt the balance of power in India’s favour, which might compel Pakistan “to start taking extraordinary measures to ensure a capability for deterrence and defence.” This immediately brought a repartee from the audience that India and Pakistan were poised to get into a nuclear arms race, producing more nuclear weapons than they needed, thus acquiring more nuclear warheads than possessed by France and the United Kingdom.

President George Bush is going ahead with legislation that would allow the US to export nuclear technology to India despite the fact that India is not a signatory to the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT). The Pakistani ambassador is of the opinion that the forthcoming legislation should not be country-specific but should similarly exempt other non-signatory states (Pakistan, Israel) “provided they meet the same criteria as India”. The answer from the other side is that India is different from Pakistan in that it has democracy and has not indulged in the smuggling of lethal nuclear parts like Pakistan’s “national hero” scientist, Dr AQ Khan.

Once India is exempted from the technology-export ban, it will open its civilian nuclear programme to full inspections by the IAEA. Pakistan can also submit itself to the same regime if it too is exempted from the ban. It may have a bad record with regard to its pledge not to export nuclear weapons technology, but it has come a long way from the period when people like AQ Khan operated without any let or hindrance. In fact, its policy of normalisation with India — more crucial than perhaps the world realises — will serve to strike at the very root of why Pakistan needed to have the bomb in the first place.

India’s record on democracy may be impressive but Pakistan’s turnaround after 2001 is in many ways more important. It has put itself squarely in the middle of a global effort to stamp out terrorism and has rolled back those policies that had propelled it towards international isolation and dangerous internal trends. At the present moment it stands on the verge of an economic revival that should serve to take the Pakistani mind away from military insecurity. It is planning together with India and Iran to provide against future energy shortages that South Asia will face if the regional economies take off. Because of the nuclear ban, both India and Pakistan have not been able to keep abreast of their demand for electricity. Both deserve to be encouraged to go down the economic road that will bring relief to their hungry masses. It would be dangerous to leave Pakistan out of the civilian nuclear deal, and unwise to let it feel once again that “balance of power” in the region can be maintained through economic sacrifice.

Another reason why the US must think of giving Pakistan civilian nuclear technology is Pakistan’s failure to develop an internal consensus on the management of its water resources to produce cheap electricity. Unfortunately India may not be persuaded under the Indus Water Treaty to divert waters belonging to it. This leaves Pakistan only the nuclear option in the field of energy. This means that as long as the ban is in place it has to make even nuclear electricity stealthily. But if nuclear technology for energy is made available in return for full-scope safeguards on civilian nuclear plants, this will help Pakistan come out of the closet. Sale of dangerous nuclear weapons technology is possible at all times when a state is under an economic crunch.

As it is, the US is thinking of giving Pakistan a lot of military equipment including some 100 F-16 warplanes to maintain the “balance of power” in the region. All this will come to naught if India is exempted from the ban and civilian nuclear technology is made available to it and not to Pakistan. More complications will be introduced into the international nuclear control regime if other nuclear powers start reconsidering the ban. For instance, it would be natural for China to reconsider its decision to exercise restraint with regard to nuclear technology export to Pakistan. A lot of positive developments are taking place in Pakistan to transform it into a “normal” cooperative state in the world community. A fair and even-handed approach by the US at this stage would help it along that road. *
Posted by: john 2005-09-11
http://www.rantburg.com/poparticle.php?ID=129210