|
Mark Steyn on the Oscars
EFL'd to get to the part where he eviscerates George Clooney.
. . . Say what you like about those Hollywood guys in the Thirties but they were serious about their leftism. Say what you like about those Hollywood guys in the Seventies but they were serious about their outrage at what was done to the lefties in the McCarthy era though they might have been better directing their anger at the movie-industry muscle that enforced the blacklist. By comparison, Clooneys is no more than a pose hes acting at activism, new Hollywood mimicking old Hollywoods robust defense of even older Hollywood. Hes more taken by the idea of speaking truth to power than the footling question of whether the truth hes speaking to power is actually true.
Thats why Hollywood prefers to make controversial films about controversies that are settled, rousing itself to fight battles long won. Go back to USA Todays approving list of Hollywoods willingness to broach tough issues: Brokeback and Capote for their portrayal of gay characters; Crash for its examination of racial tension
That might have been bold courageous movie-making half-a-century ago. Ever seen the Dirk Bogarde film Victim? He plays a respectable married barrister whose latest case threatens to expose his own homosexuality. That was 1961, when homosexuality was illegal in the United Kingdom and Bogarde was the British movie industrys matinee idol and every schoolgirls pin-up: Thats brave. Doing it at a time when your typical conservative politician gets denounced as homophobic because hes only in favor of civil unions is just an exercise in moral self-congratulation. And, unlike the media, most of the American people are savvy enough to conclude that by definition that doesnt require their participation.
These films are transgressive mostly in the sense that Transamerica is transsexual. I like Felicity Huffman and all, and Im not up to speed with the latest strictures on identity-group casting but isnt it a bit condescending to get a lifelong woman (or whatever the expression is) to play a transsexual? If Hollywood announced Al Jolson would be playing Martin Luther King, Im sure Denzel Washington and co would have something to say about it. Were no transsexual actresses available for this role? I know at least one of my acquaintance, and there was a transsexual Bond girl in the late Roger Moore era who looked incredibly hot, albeit with a voice several octaves below Paul Robeson. What about that cutie with the very fetching Adams apple from The Crying Game? And, just as Transamericas allegedly unconventional woman is a perfectly conventional woman underneath, so the entire slate of Oscar nominees is, in a broader sense, a phalanx of Felicity Huffmans. Theyre dressing up daringly and flouncing around as controversy, but underneath theyre simply the conventional wisdom. Indeed, Transamerica would make a good name for Hollywoods view of its domestic market a bizarro United States run by racists and homophobes and a poodle media in thrall to the Administration.
You can certainly find new wrinkles on racial tensions Abies Wahhabi Rose? but Hollywood controversy seems more an evasion of controversy. If you want it in a single word, its the difference between the title of George Jonas original book Vengeance and the title of the film Steven Spielberg made of it Munich. Vengeance is a point of view, Munich is a round of self-applause for the point of view that having no point of view is the most sophisticated point of view of all a position whose empty smugness is most deftly summarized by the final shot of the movie, the Twin Towers on the New York skyline. For a serious film, it would be hard to end on a more fundamentally unserious note.
"Munich" is also a synonym for pacifist appeasement in the face of aggressive evil. Mere coincidence? Neville--oops, I mean Stephen Speilberg may have been more correct than he'll ever appreciate.
But then its hard to be serious when youve made a virtue of dodging the tough choices of the age. The BritLit blockbusters currently keeping Hollywood afloat Harry Potter, Narnia, Lord Of The Rings may be ghastly Multiplex crowd-pleasers unworthy of great artists like George Clooney but theyre not a retreat to the periphery in the way that Hollywood seriousness is.
I hope Steyn's just mocking George Clooney here, and not slagging Harry Potter, Narnia, and LoTR. Tolkein is great literature on a level most writers can only dream of approaching. The Narnia books are some of the most serious children's literature ever written, by one of the most serious theologians and apologists of the last century. Even Harry Potter has an awful lot going on beyond a simple story.
Okay, i'll shut up now.
Spielbergs lingering shot of the World Trade Center wasnt even the most equisitely framed banality of the year. That honor goes to The Constant Gardener, which may yet win Rachel Weisz an Oscar for her role as a passionate anti-globalization activist who dies in mysterious circumstances. At one point Ralph Fiennes is doing his signature stare, peering elliptically into the distance, when the camera pulls back to show him as a little stick-figure dwarfed by the mega-multinational pharmaceutical companys corporate headquarters hes standing outside.
Oh, come off it. The Constant Gardener is distributed by Universal Pictures. Dont they have a big office? If King Kongs standing outside waiting to get past security to find out why his residuals check has bounced, then Universal might look like some little momnpop operation. But stick any of the rest of us on the sidewalk and wed be like Ralph Fiennes outside Big Pharma. Thats Hollywood: no-one lavishes more care and expense on saying nothing.
Three months after 9/11, George Clooney was asked what he wanted for Christmas. I want, he said, one day when nobody is getting shot at. Call a truce for a day. Our own Jay Nordlinger remarked at the time that this was a childs response, correctly noting the implied moral randomness
People are just shooting at each other, you know, and shooting at each other is bad.
Actually, most children have a more sophisticated view of things than that.
If you want stories about journalists, nobody was shooting on the day The Wall Street Journals Daniel Pearl had his head sawed off. If you want stories about racial tensions, nobody was shooting on the day British expat Ken Bigley was similarly decapitated. Hollywoods bravery is an almost pathological retreat: its against segregated drinking fountains in Alabama and blacklisting writers on 1950s variety shows. Its in danger of becoming an oldies station with only three records. . . .
Posted by: Mike 2006-03-03 |
http://www.rantburg.com/poparticle.php?ID=144341 |
|