|
Generals' revolt?
As the author points out, this has serious implications for civilian control of the military.Consider two hypothetical situations. In the first, a United States Army general officer in a theater of war decides by himself that he strongly disagrees with the orders of the secretary of defense. He resigns his commission, returns to private life and speaks out vigorously against both the policy and the secretary of defense. In example two, the top 100 generals in the Army military chain of command secretly agree amongst themselves to retire and speak out -- each one day after the other. If an officer has no confidence in his civilian superiors then he should fall on his sword, not retire and criticize. ...This may sound far-fetched, but in Sunday's Washington Post the very smart, very well-connected former Clinton Ambassador to the United Nations Richard Holbrooke published an article entitled "Behind the Military Revolt." In this article he predicts that there will be increasing numbers of retired generals speaking out against Sec. Rumsfeld. Then, shockingly, he writes the following words: "If more angry generals emerge -- and they will -- if some of them are on active duty, as seems probable . . . then this storm will continue until finally it consumes not only Donald Rumsfeld." Article continues -- read the whole thing. Holbrooke is a clintonite toad but he is, as Blankley says, well connected. We should be very, very concerned about such a possibility. Posted by: Jonathan 2006-04-18 |
| http://www.rantburg.com/poparticle.php?ID=148995 |