|
Thinkable?: Wage Genocide War Against Muslims
Toying with Genocide1. The Most Dangerous Game LURKING BENEATH OUR INTERNAL ARGUMENT concerning the relentless demographic expansion of Islam into the West without assimilation, is the persistent background question, "Oh, my, whatever shall WE do with THEM?" Shortly after 9-11, I predicted that waging unwinnable containment-war would only generate total destruction thinking. We have seen it in the blogs for quite some time; now it is in the open. My thinking is: Islam is programed mind control; Muslims can, and should, be de-programed. A Persian co-worker informed me that 300,000 Iranian immigrants to the US have abandoned the Arab hate cult. Only our hate laws prevent Persian converts from pro-active work against the Arabists. Who needs mass slaughter? I do advocate summary execution of anyone who finances, incites, participates in or serves as an accessory after the fact to terror. WE are, you see, like muddlers and fiddlers since Nero, worried about THEM. Our doltish conservative muddlers and fiddlers worry about what "THEY will do to US" if we aren't very, very careful and selective about which of THEM we capture or kill while WE seek to give THEM the "gifts" of freedom and democracy. Our brave new fiddlers on the Left fiddle about worrying if THEY have enough to eat, enough to wear, enough respect, enough, in short, of the love THEY deserve for not killing US today. Before we exclude Muslims from freedom of religion protections, we must cease denial of their domination plans. They are thinking of an Islamic world. No? Check this link: http://muslim-canada.org/muslimstats.html Both bumbling groups may differ in the focus of their fretting, but fret they do. For the problem, as they have defined it, has to do with what is commonly stated as 'a statistically small group of Muslims around the world' who need to be dealt with in some manner so that greater Islam can get on with the historic task of being "a religion of peace and understanding." The majority of both camps of muddlers and fiddlers agree on this one thing: It isn't Islam that's the problem, just a few heretics that have gotten out of hand in their zeal to obey the will of God, and, hey, who hasn't done that from time to time? One solution, commonly referenced as "the Left/Liberal" position is essentially "leave them alone and they'll come home. They know its for their own good." The other solution, "the Right/Conservative" position, is to force assimilation, modernization, reformation and democratic mechanisms upon Islam "for its own good." The two positions agree that "something must be done." They differ only in their specifications for "a New!, Improved! Islam" that can play well with other religions and nations in the post-modern world where "business as usual" is worshipped more than any other state of affairs. Both positions, whether they focus on "giving" the benefits of the modern world to the West's Islamic populations spread out in its cities and nations, or "bringing" the same benefits to the center of Islamic mass in the Middle East, share the belief that Islam can be "fixed." Once you understand that the question posed by both enclaves of political "thinkers" boils down to "How can WE best fix THEM?" the subtext of the whole Big Argument starts to echo Richard II: Let's talk of graves, of worms, and epitaphs; Make dust our paper and with rainy eyes Write sorrow on the bosom of the earth, Let's choose executors and talk of wills.... People think this way when they abridge consideration of the fact that Muslims can be de-programed. One thing is true for all Rantburgers: every freedom you enjoy, most possessions you cherish, your familial relations, etc, would be negated in a Muslim world. Start the de-programing. Posted by: Sneaze Shaiting3550 2006-12-18 |
| http://www.rantburg.com/poparticle.php?ID=175430 |