|
John Podhoretz: SMART, but WRONG, why W 's firing Gen. Casey
January 3, 2007 -- YESTERDAY, the man directly responsible for conducting the war in Iraq received semi-official notice that he'll soon be relieved of his post. It's ironic that the semi-official notice came in a front-page New York Times story, considering how hostile the paper has been to the war effort and the Bush administration generally - and how profoundly angry senior Bush officials are at the Times. Welcome to 2007. Democrats rule Capitol Hill, and the Bush White House is using The Times to deliver a message. Who says things never change in Washington? The message: The president has lost confidence in the strategy and tactics designed and implemented by the generals running the war. They have, as the Times put it, "become more fixated on withdrawal than victory." The commandant of the Marine Corps, Gen. James T. Conway, told the Times that the president went to the Pentagon a few weeks ago and said flatly, "What I want to hear from you is how we're going to win, not how we're going to leave." And that's basically why, according to the Times, "Bush seems all but certain not only to reverse the strategy that Gen. Casey championed, but also to accelerate the general's departure from Iraq." Posted by: Wuzzalib 2007-01-04 |
| http://www.rantburg.com/poparticle.php?ID=176845 |