IPS: Why Iran Protects Al-Qaâeda
By Nawaf Obaid
EFL and Fair Use
BEIRUT (IPS) As the Saudi officials have stated that Iran has failed to hand over any of the al-Qaâeda terrorists it is supposed to hold, a senior Saudi oil and security analyst said, "Since the demise of the Taleban, Iran has become a sanctuary for al-Qaâeda, making it the only place in the world where both Shiâite and Sunni terrorists have found haven".
Echoes of Michael Ledeenâs article.
On Monday 24 August, press reports citing Iranâs ambassador in Riyadh, Ali Asqar Haji, suggested that Iran had handed over to Saudi Arabia a number of al-Qaâeda members. However, the individuals, like the 16 Saudis Iran turned over last year, are merely foot soldiers.
Hoping they can get by with a little cannon fodder...
But on Sunday, Saudi Arabian Interior Minister Amir Nayef Ben Abdelâaziz, in an interview with the pan Arabic daily Al Hayat, denied the report, saying that so far Iran has refused to cooperate with Saudi Arabia over the al-Qaâeda.
And the Saudis, now that terrorism has come home to the Magic Kingdom, wonât accept the "weâre all Brother Muslims" crap, anymore...
Iranâs refusal to grant access to over a dozen of senior Saudi-born al-Qaâeda suspects is disturbing, says Mr. Nawaf Obaid, a senior Saudi oil and political analyst.
Some whoâs obviously been given the go ahead to stir this pot on behalf of Abdullah...
"What the Saudis want are the ringleaders of one of the last functioning al-Qaâeda cells with regional command and control powers. Intelligence officials also believe that members of this group know the identities of dozens of al-Qaâeda operatives dispersed in Saudi Arabia, Europe and the United States", according to Mr. Obaid.
"Hey, Dude! This just wonât cut it, yaâknow? We want the biggies! Gotta stop this shit - in the Kingdom, anyway. We might pass along the little fish to the Fibbies."
That is why Saudi officials are keen to interrogate the suspects. In the last few months, however, Iran has hindered this effort.
Doh!
"To be more precise, radical Iranian clerics have hindered these efforts. Iranâs moderate President, Mohammad Khatami, has promised to hand over the Saudi al-Qaâeda suspects. However, Saudi security officials were twice rebuffed when arriving to pick them up", Mr. Nawaf Oaid wrote in the Beirut based The Daily Star.
"Are they ready to go?"
"Who?"
"The bad guys, you dimwit!"
"Sure, here ya go..."
"Why, these arenât the right guys - theyâre all Noor Tantrays! Yâknow, little fish!"
"Sorry, thatâs all we have for you today. Coming back tomorrow?"
"NO! This means the gloves are off, man! Weâre going to the press!
In the most recent attempt, Prince Mohammad bin Nayef, the assistant Minister of Interior for Security Affairs (the highest civilian administrator of the Saudi Arabian General Security Service), was told he would not be allowed to see the prisoners. A senior general in the Saudi General Intelligence Presidency who oversees coordination with Iranâs Intelligence Ministry was furious. According to him people close to Ayatollah Ali Khamenehâi, the leader of the Islamic Republic of Iran are holding up the extradition because they fear theyâll be implicated.
No shit, Sherlock.
"This episode highlights the strength of Khamenehâi and the radical clerics who follow him. Khamenehâi controls several powerful state security organs, including Iranâs Revolutionary Guards and the newly created Foreign Intelligence Service. Both report directly to Khamenehâiâs Office of the Supreme Leader, entirely bypassing Khatamiâs government", Mr. Obaid added.
So much for Khatami, as if this is a surprise.
In the past few years, American, Saudi and other regional intelligence services have compiled a detailed dossier on the extremists within these institutions and their connections to international terrorism.
More...
One question for Rantburgers:
What is the difference between the Taliban and the Black Hats, now, other than the fact that the Black Hats are rapidly becoming a nuclear threat to the region and, in particular, Israel?
How about, after answering that question, Rantburgers open up the debate on what you think would be required to topple the Black Hats and bring to power something far far less dangerous. Iâve suggested it would not require a bunch of boots on the ground - but some remote-controlled decapitation strikes, instead. Letâs hear it, folks. What do you think the US can and should do?
Posted by: .com 2003-09-03 |