Huffablogger says Hitler et al. "meant well"
The folks at the Powerline discussion boards found a live one:
Please read this blog entry by Peter Mehlman at the Huffington Post entitled At Least They Didnt Mean Well (June 20, 2007):
Boy, America has had a lot of s***ty presidents. Just take a stroll down repressed memory land and look at that police line-up from November 22, 1963 through January 1992. Ford may come out looking the best of the bunch and he was widely acknowledged to be unable to walk and chew gum. (Wisely, his advisors encouraged him to sit while chewing).
And really, Clinton could have been a lot better too.
So now were six and a half years into Bush and everyone from Helen Thomas on down is declaring him the worst president ever. What no one is saying is the one overarching reason hes the worst: the Bush administration is the first that doesnt even mean well. . . .
You could argue that even the worlds worst fascist dictators at least meant well. They honestly thought were doing good things for their countries by suppressing blacks/eliminating Jews/eradicating free enterprise/repressing individual thought/killing off rivals/invading neighbors, etc. Only the Saudi royal family is driven by the same motives as Bush, but they were already entrenched. Bush set a new precedent. He came into office with the attitude of Im so tired of the public good. What about my good? What about my rich friends good?
How can anyone not see it? Its not that their policies have been misguided or havent played out right. They. Dont. Even. Mean. Well.
Boldface in original.
Posted by: Mike 2007-07-06 |