Archdruid of Canterbury sez in Muslim mag: US is worst imperialist'
THE Archbishop of Canterbury has said that the United States wields its power in a way that is worse than Britain during its imperial heyday. Rowan Williams claimed that Americas attempt to intervene overseas by clearing the decks with a quick burst of violent action had led to the worst of all worlds.
Interesting. I'd have said that al Qaeda's "quick burst of violent action" has led to the "worst of all worlds", but then, Rowan Williams has proven himself to be a hater of Western civilization, a self-loather embracing cultural, perhaps physical, suicide.
In a wide-ranging interview with a British Muslim magazine, the Anglican leader linked criticism of the United States to one of his most pessimistic declarations about the state of western civilisation.
He said the crisis was caused not just by Americas actions but also by its misguided sense of its own mission. He poured scorn on the chosen nation myth of America, meaning that what happens in America is very much at the heart of Gods purpose for humanity.
Without the United States of America, there would be NO Church of England today.
Sure there would, but high Mass would be in German. | Williams went beyond his previous critique of the conduct of the war on terror, saying the United States had lost the moral high ground since September 11. He urged it to launch a generous and intelligent programme of aid directed to the societies that have been ravaged; a check on the economic exploitation of defeated territories; a demilitarisation of their presence.
The United States of America, for better or for ill, has saved the lives of more Muslims than any other country on Earth.
He went on to suggest that the West was fundamentally adrift: Our modern western definition of humanity is clearly not working very well. There is something about western modernity which really does eat away at the soul.
"Mirror, Mirror on the wall ..."
Williams suggested American leadership had broken down: We have only one global hegemonic power. It is not accumulating territory: it is trying to accumulate influence and control. Thats not working.
He contrasted it unfavourably with how the British Empire governed India. It is one thing to take over a territory and then pour energy and resources into administering it and normalising it. Rightly or wrongly, thats what the British Empire did in India, for example.
Oh, my, God. And when the British ceased their "administering" and left the subcontinent, one of the greatest bloodbaths in history took place. The British Jimmy Carter
It is another thing to go in on the assumption that a quick burst of violent action will somehow clear the decks and that you can move on and other people will put it back together Iraq, for example.
In the interview in Emel , a Muslim lifestyle magazine, Williams makes only mild criticisms of the Islamic world. He said the Muslim world must acknowledge that its political solutions were not the most impressive. He commends the Muslim practice of praying five times a day, which he says allows the remembrance of God to be built in deeply in their daily rhythm.
This is leadership?
The complete interview can be found HERE (PDF)
Posted by: mrp 2007-11-25 |