Minneapolis City Council bans elephant rides
James Lileks, buzz.mn
I knew they weren't much for Republicans up that way, but sheesh!
Last year the City Council, which seems to think that running a city poorly qualifies them to run a circus well, passed an ordinance governing the treatment of elephants. Increased fees always a favorite and increased inspection. The show would go on. But as Council Member Ralph Remington put it in words we should all memorize Weve come a long way. But it can go just a little bit further.
So now the City Council Member Cam Gordon has proposed a new amendment to the ordinance, banning elephant rides. The reason? Public Safety. Not that Jumbo has ever tossed a kid. Not that anyones ever had a toe trod upon by an elephant or fallen off.
But it could happen:
"We could still have a great circus experience and a profitable one if we did without this act," said Gordon during last week's public safety and regulatory services committee meeting. "This would be a way to proactively avoid a horrible situation." . . .
. . . As for having a profitable circus, the Shriners say theyll seriously consider leaving the city if they cant have the rides, because they raise a lot of money. Apparently they are mistaken; we can only hope that the City Council, which surely has an intimate knowledge of circus economics, shares some tips and hints.
Posted by: Mike 2008-01-30 |