|
How Broadcast Journalism is Flawed (Devastating critique)
 by Steve Salerno It is the measure of the medias obsession with its pedophiles run amok! story line that so many of us are on a first-name basis with the victims: Polly, Amber, JonBenet, Danielle, Elizabeth, Samantha. And now there is Madeleine. Clearly these crimes were and are horrific, and nothing here is intended to diminish the parents loss. But something else has been lost in the bargain as journalists tirelessly stoke fear of strangers, segueing from nightly-news segments about cyber-stalkers and the rapist in your neighborhood to prime-time reality series like Datelines To Catch a Predator. That something else is reality. According to the U.S. Department of Justice, in a given year there are about 88,000 documented cases of sexual abuse among juveniles. In the roughly 17,500 cases involving children between ages 6 and 11, strangers are the perpetrators just 5 percent of the time and just 3 percentof the time when the victim is under age 6. (Further, more than a third of such molesters are themselves juveniles, who may not be true predators so much as confused or unruly teens.) Overall, the odds that one of Americas 48 million children under age 12 will encounter an adult pedophile at the local park are startlingly remote. The Child Molestation Research & Prevention Institute puts it like so: Right now, 90 percent of our efforts go toward protecting our children from strangers, when what we need to do is to focus 90 percent of our efforts toward protecting children from the abusers who are not strangers. Thats a diplomatic way of phrasing the uncomfortable but factually supported truth: that if your child is not molested in your own home by you, your significant other, or someone else you invited in chances are your child will never be molested anywhere. Media coverage has precisely inverted both the reality and the risk of child sexual assault. Along the way, it has also inverted the gender of the most tragic victims: Despite the unending parade of young female faces on TV, boys are more likely than girls to be killed in the course of such abuse. We think we know Big Journalisms faults by its much ballyhooed lapses its scandals, gaffes, and breakdowns as well as by a recent spate of insider tell-alls. When Dan Rather goes public with a sensational expose based on bogus documents; when the Atlanta Journal Constitution wrongly labels Richard Jewell the Olympic Park bomber; when Dateline resorts to rigging explosive charges to the gas tanks of unsafe trucks that, in Datelines prior tests, stubbornly refused to explode on their own; when the New York Times Jayson Blair scoops other reporters working the same story by quoting sources who dont exist We see these incidents as atypical, the exceptions that prove the rule. Sadly, were mistaken. To argue that a decided sloppiness has crept into journalism or that the media have been hijacked by [insert least favorite political agenda] badly misses the real point; it suggests that all we need to do to fix things is filter out the gratuitous political spin or rig the ship to run a bit tighter. In truth, todays system of news delivery is an enterprise whose procedures, protocols, and underlying assumptions all but guarantee that it cannot succeed at its self described mission. Broadcast journalism in particular is flawed in such a fundamental way that its utility as a tool for illuminating life, let alone interpreting it, is almost nil. This is long but well worth reading. The last line of the excerpt summarizes the article's case: Broadcast journalism is inherently flawed and a menace to rational discourse and the democratic process. Posted by: Atomic Conspiracy 2008-02-15 |
| http://www.rantburg.com/poparticle.php?ID=226619 |