E-MAIL THIS LINK
To: 

Saddam not a dictator at BBC
Snipped from a Daily Telegraph Opinion column with the interesting title "London Spy"
"An email has been circulated telling us not to refer to Saddam as a dictator," I’m told. "Instead, we are supposed to describe him as the former leader of Iraq.
Tsk, tsk.
"Apparently, because his presidency was endorsed in a referendum, he was technically elected. Hence the word dictator is banned. It’s all rather ridiculous."
This wouldn’t be a problem @ NYT. He’d be "Mr. Hussein."
The Beeb insists that the email merely restates existing guidelines. "We wanted to remind journalists whose work is seen and heard internationally of the need to use neutral language," says a spokesman.
Andrew Sullivan:
Under these guidelines, would Hitler have ever been called a "dictator"? He was originally elected in a freer election than Saddam, after all.
Heh. Too easy.


Posted by: Glenn (not Reynolds) 2003-12-20
http://www.rantburg.com/poparticle.php?ID=23087