E-MAIL THIS LINK
To: 

Iraq War "Over, in a Sense", sez WaPo
Maybe it was the only shot heard for days in a neighborhood once ordered by the cadence of gunfire. Perhaps it was the smiles at checkpoints and the shouts of Iraqi policemen navigating the always snarled traffic. "God's mercy on your parents," they beseeched. "God's blessings on you." Maybe it was the music box still playing "Santa Claus Is Coming to Town" at a kiosk overflowing with Christmas tree decorations and heart-shaped red pillows.

For anyone returning to Baghdad after spending time here during its darkest days two years ago, when it was paralyzed by sectarian hatred and overrun by gunmen sowing despair, the conclusion seemed inescapable.

"The war has ended," said Heidar al-Abboudi, a street merchant.

The war in Iraq is indeed over, at least the conflict as it was understood during its first five years: insurgency, communal cleansing, gangland turf battles and an anarchic, often futile quest to survive. In other words, civil war - though civil war was always too tidy a term for it. The entropy, for now at least, has run its course. So have many of the forces the United States so dangerously unleashed with its 2003 invasion, turning Iraq into an atomized, fractured land seized by a paroxysm of brutality. In that Iraq, the Americans were the final arbiter and, as a result, deprived anything they left behind of legitimacy.
I beg your pardon?
More hand-wringing nonsense ...
Not to say that there is peace in Iraq. As many people are killed today as on any day in 2003 and 2004.
But perhaps not as many as in 2000, 2001, and 2002.
Nor is there victory. For any Iraqi, the word, translated into Arabic, draws a dumbfounded look. Victory for whom? Certainly not the tens of thousands of civilians - perhaps many more - killed in the frenzied clashes of those once inchoate forces.
How about victory for civilization? Victory for the rule of law? Victory in the war on despots? Victory against totalitarianism? A victory in the War on Terror?
Victory for common people in Iraq who just want to go about their business. Victory for children who will go to school. Victory for the women who don't have to worry about Uday Hussein raping them. Victory for people who won't be fed into shredding machines. Victory for the Marsh Arabs who have their way of life restored. Victory for the Kurds who won't be gassed anytime soon. Victory for the Shi'a who can go on pilgrimages free of fear. Victory for the mixed couples in Iraq who once again can marry and go about their lives. Victory for ordinary people who are free again to build ordinary lives.

I could go on. The unfortunate thing is, the WaPo reporter missed all of this.
Rather, it is the day after.

Baghdad feels much as southern Lebanon did after an asymmetrical war there in 2006, between Israel and Hezbollah, the Shiite Muslim movement that fought Israel to a draw. Survivors rose from the rubble of their homes, offices and stores with the satisfied smile of survival - in war, its own victory. Then they beheld the destruction the fighting had wrought around them. Their faces turned grim as they realized the task at hand.
How would he know -- was he there? And if so, on which side?
It is perhaps the day before, too.

"We don't know what's next," Shidrak George, a bystander, said April 9, 2003, as he watched men vainly assault Saddam Hussein's statue in Firdaus Square with chains, a sledgehammer and a cascade of rocks before making way for a bulky Marine M88 armored recovery vehicle to pull it down. The vehicle stopped for no one. It didn't have to.

He said everything remained ghamidh - mysterious and unclear.

"We want to know how this turns out."
Posted by: Bobby 2009-01-02
http://www.rantburg.com/poparticle.php?ID=258826