E-MAIL THIS LINK
To: 

Oral sex is alibi in fatal crash
We never saw this on "Columbo"...
MIDDLETOWN, Conn. — A woman charged with causing a fatal car crash said she could not have been behind the wheel because she was performing a sex act on the driver.
Okay! Not guilty! Need a ride home, hon?
Heather Specyalski, 33, was charged with second-degree manslaughter in the 1999 crash that killed businessman Neil Esposito. Prosecutors allege that she was driving Esposito’s Mercedes-Benz convertible when it veered off the road and hit several trees.
Neat trick. Was she using a periscope?
Specyalski said that Esposito was driving and that she was performing oral sex on him, said her attorney, Jeremiah Donovan. He noted that Esposito’s pants were down when he was thrown from the car.
I’ll bet Ted Kennedy’s kicking himself in the ass that he didn’t think of this one about thirty years ago. "I was...ahhhhhmmmm...getting a beanah! Therefore, I am...ahhhhmmmmm... innocent!
Superior Court Judge Robert L. Holzberg ruled Tuesday that Specyalski could proceed with the defense, despite objections by the prosecutor.
Looks like Judge Holzberg wants to be on Court TV.
“A defendant has a right to offer a defense, no matter how outlandish, silly or unbelievable one might think it will be,” Holzberg said.
Will there be graphs? Charts? Exhibits?
He added: “No one ever told me in law school that we’d be having these kinds of conversations in open court.”
He must’ve been in law school a long, long time ago.
Assistant State’s Attorney Maureen Platt said the defense was flawed.“His pants could have been down because he was mooning a car he was drag racing,” Platt said. “His pants could have been down because he was urinating out of a window. His pants could have been down because he wasn’t feeling well.”
Counselor Platt doesn’t date much evidently.
Also Tuesday, Holzberg denied Donovan’s motion to use gender as grounds to eliminate jurors. Donovan had argued that women would be biased and more likely to convict.
I hope we get to hear the closing arguments. They could be very interesting.
Posted by: tu3031 2004-03-05
http://www.rantburg.com/poparticle.php?ID=27522