E-MAIL THIS LINK
To: 

Police Let Terrorist Slip Through
Port Authority police were told to stop and search would-be subway bomber Najibullah Zazi's car last September as he drove up to the George Washington Bridge--but waved him across without finding two pounds of explosives hidden inside.

The failure to uncover the explosives after an alert about Mr. Zazi from the Federal Bureau of Investigation has been widely discussed among police but never publicly disclosed. It stoked longstanding tensions between the Port Authority Police and the New York Police Department, which are more pronounced since the 9/11 attacks. The Port Authority is tasked with protecting the bridges, tunnels and major airports between New York and New Jersey.

The Zazi case is especially sensitive for New York police, who privately argue that letting Mr. Zazi continue into the city was a potentially catastrophic gaffe by the Port Authority Police. Several NYPD detectives were accused of short-circuiting the case by talking to a Queens-based imam who worked as an NYPD informant. The imam was accused of alerting Mr. Zazi that police were on to him.

Ron Kuby, the attorney representing Imam Ahmad Wais Afzali, said evidence in his client's case suggests Mr. Zazi was tipped off by the staged FBI/Port Authority Police drug checkpoint before he ever spoke to the imam.

"Either the Port Authority [Police] found the explosives and were under orders by the FBI not to seize anything," Mr. Kuby said, "or somehow they missed the explosives that they were explicitly told to search for." In April, the imam pleaded guilty to lying to federal agents for initially denying he talked to Mr. Zazi and was sentenced to time served and ordered deported.

Spokesmen for the Port Authority and the FBI declined comment.

But Port Authority and FBI officials with knowledge of the investigation said there were factors that made the search of Mr. Zazi's car a touchy proposition. The Port Authority stopped Mr. Zazi at the behest of the FBI, which had tracked him nearly 1,800 miles from Colorado. To avoid tipping him off, they pretended the stop was a random drug checkpoint.

A Port Authority officer said police didn't have a warrant. That prevented them from conducting a thorough search of the vehicle without making Mr. Zazi suspicious. Anything seized from the car in such a search would have been inadmissible in court, he said.
The difference between treating it like a crime and treating it like an act of war. Suppose Mr. Zazi had decided to set off his explosives on the bridge, just moments later?
"It was a cursory stop," the officer said. "We didn't have a search warrant, no permission to go into the car."

Mr. Zazi, an Afghan native who grew up in Queens, got rid of the explosives soon after the Sept. 10, 2009, search of his rental car, fearing he was under surveillance. He flew back to his home in Colorado and was arrested there after admitting he trained with al Qaeda in Afghanistan and planned to use the explosive--triacetone triperoxide, or TATP--for a subway attack based on the deadly 2005 London bombings. He later called it a "martyrdom operation."

Mr. Zazi pleaded guilty in the conspiracy case in February. His sentencing is set for June 25.
Posted by: tipper 2010-04-26
http://www.rantburg.com/poparticle.php?ID=295421