|
Muslims Soon to Outnumber Jamaicans as Prisoners in the UK
Concluding paragraphs of interesting article from Londonâs City Journal
One sign of the increasing weakness of Islamâs hold over its nominal adherents in Britain â of which militancy is itself but another sign - is the throng of young Muslim men in prison. They will soon overtake the young men of Jamaican origin in their numbers and in the extent of their criminality. By contrast, young Sikhs and Hindus are almost completely absent from prison, so racism is not the explanation for such Muslim overrepresentation.
| Except that Sikhs and Hindus aren't Muslims, as the Muslims themselves will point out. There goes that theory all blown to hell and back. |
| It would appear to be religion and culture, not race, wouldn't it? |
Confounding expectations, these prisoners display no interest in Islam whatsoever; they are entirely secularized. True, they still adhere to Muslim marriage customs, but only for the obvious personal advantage of having a domestic slave at home. Many of them also dot the city with their concubinesâsluttish white working-class girls or exploitable young Muslims who have fled forced marriages and do not know that their young men are married. This is not religion, but having oneâs cake and eating it.
| Or the worst of the culture without the religion... |
The young Muslim men in prison do not pray; they do not demand halal meat. They do not read the Quâran. They do not ask to see the visiting imam. They wear no visible signs of piety: their main badge of allegiance is a gold front tooth, which proclaims them members of the cityâs criminal subcultureâa badge (of honor, they think) that they share with young Jamaicans, though their relations with the Jamaicans are otherwise fraught with hostility. The young Muslim men want wives at home to cook and clean for them, concubines elsewhere, and drugs and rock ânâ roll. As for Muslim proselytism in the prisonâand Muslim literature has been insinuated into nooks and crannies there far more thoroughly than any Christian literatureâit is directed mainly at the Jamaican prisoners. It answers their need for an excuse to go straight, while not at the same time surrendering to the morality of a society they believe has wronged them deeply. Indeed, conversion to Islam is their revenge upon that society, for they sense that their newfound religion is fundamentally opposed to it. By conversion, therefore, they kill two birds with one stone. But Islam has no improving or inhibiting effect upon the behavior of my cityâs young Muslim men, who, in astonishing numbers, have taken to heroin, a habit almost unknown among their Sikh and Hindu contemporaries. The young Muslims not only take heroin but deal in it, and have adopted all the criminality attendant on the trade.
| Sikh and Hindu youths also aren't in jail. Coincidence? |
What I think these young Muslim prisoners demonstrate is that the rigidity of the traditional code by which their parents live, with its universalist pretensions and emphasis on outward conformity to them, is all or nothing; when it dissolves, it dissolves completely and leaves nothing in its place. The young Muslims then have little defense against the egotistical licentiousness they see about them and that they all too understandably take to be the summum bonum of Western life.
| Of course the alternative of engaging in Western life, making something of themselves, self-sacrifice, delayed gratification, education and hard work, passed right by them. |
Observing this, of course, there are among Muslim youth a tiny minority who reject this absorption into the white lumpenproletariat and turn militant or fundamentalist. It is their perhaps natural, or at least understandable, reaction to the failure of our society, kowtowing to absurd and dishonest multiculturalist pieties, to induct them into the best of Western culture: into that spirit of free inquiry and personal freedom that has so transformed the life chances of every person in the world, whether he knows it or not.
| Perhaps a little less multi-culti kowtowing by our LLL friends would help people see the better aspects of Western life. |
Islam in the modern world is weak and brittle, not strong: that accounts for its so frequent shrillness. The Shah will, sooner or later, triumph over the Ayatollah in Iran, because human nature decrees it, though meanwhile millions of lives will have been ruined and impoverished. The Iranian refugees who have flooded into the West are fleeing Islam, not seeking to extend its dominion, as I know from speaking to many in my city. To be sure, fundamentalist Islam will be very dangerous for some time to come, and all of us, after all, live only in the short term; but ultimately the fate of the Church of England awaits it.
| Yassss, purty soon they'll have an Arch-Druid. |
Its melancholy, withdrawing roar may well (unlike that of the Church of England) be not just long but bloody, but withdraw it will. The fanatics and the bombers do not represent a resurgence of unreformed, fundamentalist Islam, but its death rattle.
Posted by: Mike Sylwester 2004-04-12 |
