Best of Boucherâs War of Words
In several weeks of reading and watching Richard Boucherâs daily battle against a pack of hyenas the press correspondents, I have begun to be amazed by a man who can go out each day and quietly resist being tripped up on the difference between a "central" and a "vital" role for the UN in Iraq. I am amazed at the sheer number of times that he can calmly clarify as Iraq is a country of Iraqis, they must have "the central" role in Iraq. Boucher is either very into Yoga or heavily medicated. Unless Fred cans these posts, I will try to post the best excerpts from his briefing under this heading. Here is a sample:
QUESTION: Is it correct that you are not deeply troubled about the death, about the killing of Mr. -- Dr. Rantisi? And if youâre not, why were you deeply troubled by Sheikh Yassinâs killing? Is it a question of how much influence you think these people have? I mean, presumably, if the Israelis made good on the threats, dubious threats that were out there to kill Arafat, you would come out and condemn it since he seems to be the only person -- the only Palestinian leader that youâre firmly opposed to Israel targeting. Why different language for Rantisi than Yassin?
MR. BOUCHER: Iâm not quite sure what the difference between deeply troubled and gravely concerned is. Iâll have to check with my experts on that one. I wouldnât draw too fine a --
QUESTION: Well, deeply troubled referred specifically to the killing of Sheikh Yassin and deep -- and youâre troubled --
MR. BOUCHER: Gravely concerned about the consequences --
QUESTION: I mean gravely concerned refers to --
MR. BOUCHER: -- about regional peace and stability. Iâm not going to try to draw any large distinction between the two. In this case, we point a little more towards the effects, and I think last time, if youâll remember, the briefings we did here we talked specifically about the consequences. And thatâs virtually the same thing.
Posted by: Super Hose 2004-04-20 |