|
If Obama was just going to be Bush, anyway
Elizabeth Scalia ("The Anchoress")... it seems that the Obama Administrations stated mission for Libya is one of regime change and the establishment of system of governance. Which sounds so very much like the stated mission of the Bush regime the mission that the Democrats and the press pushed, and pushed and pushed against, non-stop, for six long years. It seems, after all, that helping to establish democratic governments in the Middle East might be in Americas best interests, and in the bests interests of human liberty for the rest of the world. Helping people to claim liberty for themselves, it seems, is a good thing. Who knew? I guess what Im wondering is, how much further along would the Iraq governments stabilization be how much further along would the quest for democratic governance be, in the Middle East (and how much less reluctant would tyrants be to try to stop it by killing their own people), if only the Democrats hadnt wasted 6 years politicizing our efforts and another two years bowing and scraping and restarting and gasbagging and doing everything they could to say, were not Bush, only to become all they said they hated?... ...Im struck how Bush took months and months to rush to war while Obama seems have decided to take on Libya between writing his brackets and packing his travel bags, and yet Bush was the impulsive cowboy and Obama sigh, oh, whats the point passive aggressive? Posted by: Mike 2011-03-24 |
| http://www.rantburg.com/poparticle.php?ID=318931 |