|
Justice Dept. proposes lying, hiding existence of records under new FOIA rule
A proposed revision to Freedom of Information Act rules would allow federal agencies to lie to citizens and reporters seeking certain records, telling them the records don't exist.The Justice Department has proposed the change as part of a large revision of FOIA rules for federal agencies. Specifically, the rule would direct government agencies who are denying a request under an established FOIA exemption to "respond to the request as if the excluded records did not exist," rather than citing the relevant exemption. The proposed rule has alarmed government transparency advocates across the political spectrum, who've called it "Orwellian" and say it will "twist" public access to government. The draft FOIA revisions were first published in March, but the Justice Department re-opened comment submissions in September after several open-government groups raised objections. A Justice Department spokesperson said the agency is committed to public input and transparency, which is why it re-opened public comments on the rule -- an unusual step in the process. In a public comment regarding the rule change, the ACLU, along with Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) and OpenTheGovernment.org, said the move "will dramatically undermine government integrity by allowing a law designed to provide public access to government information to be twisted to permit federal law enforcement agencies to actively lie to the American people." Anne Weismann, the chief counsel of CREW, said the Justice Department has a legitimate purpose behind the rules: to protect sensitive information about ongoing investigations. However, she said lying about the records "is an overbroad and improper response." "The problem is, if you're a FOIA requester and the agency says they don't have the records, you have no reason to doubt that," Weismann said. "But if they cite an exemption, you have the option to sue." Those groups have suggested an alternate federal response that would not require any revisions to the rules. "We interpret all or part of your request as a request for records which, if they exist, would not be subject to the disclosure requirements of FOIA pursuant to section 552(c), and we therefore will not process that portion of your request." Conservative government watchdog Judicial Watch has also lambasted the proposed rules change. (RELATED: Obama admin. pulls references to Islam from terror training materials, official says) The news is "not surprising, coming from the Obama administration," said Christopher J. Farrell, director of investigations and research at Judicial Watch. I wonder if it applies to Congressional inquiries of DOJ? Only when Democrats are in office... Posted by: Beavis 2011-10-25 |
| http://www.rantburg.com/poparticle.php?ID=332293 |