|
Spanking = constitutional right
h/t InstapunditSo held the Hawaii Supreme Court, in Hamilton ex rel. Lethem v. Lethem (Haw. Feb. 7, 2012), interpreting the Hawaii Constitution, though in reasoning that could be seen as applicable to the federal Constitution and to other state constitutions. And the court concluded that even a noncustodial parent retains this right with respect to that childs conduct during the visitation period. Based on this constitutional right, the court concluded that, to warrant the issuance of a domestic restraining order based on alleged child abuse, there must be (1) a finding that the parents discipline is [not] reasonably related to the purpose of safeguarding or promoting the welfare of the minor, (2) taking into account factors such as [a] the nature of the misbehavior, [b] the childs age and size, and [c] the nature and propriety of the force used. Posted by: g(r)omgoru 2012-02-11 |
| http://www.rantburg.com/poparticle.php?ID=338886 |