|
Arab League says any attack would have consequences for coalition
(Reuters)
| Moussa told reporters he saw no reason why an Arab country should be the target of any offensive. |
Arab League Secretary-General Amr Moussa warned on Wednesday that any attack on Arab countries would have dire consequences for the Middle East and on the U.S.-led international coalition against "terrorism". Moussa told reporters he saw no reason why an Arab country should be the target of any offensive. But he added: "If this occurs, it would lead to a very dangerous and critical situation in the region and will harm the idea of international cooperation or an international coalition against terrorism."
Lemme get this straight: Normally, the purpose of a coalition is to accomplish something. But he's saying that if we actually do something, then there are adverse consequences, which means there isn't any coalition, doesn't it?
Posted by: Fred Pruitt 2001-10-03 |
