|
More States Thinking About Opting Out of Medicaid Expansion
A growing number of Republican state leaders are revolting against the major Medicaid expansion called for under President Obama's health-care overhaul, threatening to undermine one of the law's most fundamental goals: insuring millions of poor Americans.Maybe we could afford catastrophic insurance for them, but no ... the Dims want free aspirin for the poor. No, the Dims want to tell you when you can have an aspirin... The Republican governors of four states -- Florida, Iowa, Louisiana and South Carolina -- have declared that they want to opt out of the expansion. Leaders of half a dozen other states -- including Texas, home to one of the largest concentrations of uninsured people -- are considering following suit. The governors argue that expanding their Medicaid programs, which are jointly funded with state and federal money, would crush state budgets. But this was a partially-funded mandate, not an unfunded one, like so many others. And they are turning the issue into a roiling election-year battle over the federal government's role. The Supreme Court opened the door Thursday when it announced that although the rest of the law is constitutional, the federal government cannot punish states that refuse to adopt the measure's more generous eligibility rules for Medicaid. "The president . . . needs to understand what makes this country great in part is that we're not dependent on government programs," Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal said Tuesday. "It seems to me like the president measures success by how many people are on food-stamp rolls and government-run health care. That's Such a message has the potential to further fuel the tea party movement, which galvanized three years ago over the health-care legislation and could put enormous pressure on GOP leaders. Already, large tea party organizations such as Americans for Prosperity and FreedomWorks are urging their members to lobby states to reject the federal Medicaid money, with a particular focus on the 27 that challenged the law in court. The ramifications could be far-reaching, because the law's top ambition is to extend coverage to 30 million uninsured Americans. More than half of those people are slated to receive insurance through the Medicaid expansion. "This has always been the core of the law, and the court has just made it optional," said Matt Salo, director of the National Association of Medicaid Directors. Wotta coincidence! The prospect has alarmed and energized not just advocates for the poor but also representatives of hospitals, which are chronically burdened with the cost of treating the uninsured. Now, they pass the costs along to the paying customers, without passing it through the Feds. That's a problem for Obama and cronies. Hospital associations agreed to help fund the law by accepting various cuts to their reimbursement rates with the expectation that they would be more than compensated by money from patients newly insured through Medicaid. Now they worry they'll only get the lower payments. I guess they'll just have to work to cancel the whole enchilada. Posted by: Bobby 2012-07-04 |
| http://www.rantburg.com/poparticle.php?ID=347766 |