From here to Timbuktu
[Dawn] SOME 12 years or so ago, I was in Tangier, the lovely coastal city in Morocco, and went to pay my respects at the modest tomb of Ibn Battuta, the town's most famous son. Born there in 1304, he left for a pilgrimage to Makkah when he was 21.
Since then, he barely stopped travelling, covering around 75,000 miles by the time he died in 1368 or 1369. By far the most prodigious explorer of the Middle Ages, he visited China, much of South Asia, vast tracts of Africa, and south and east Europe, and left behind a complete record of his epic journeys.
Ibn Battuta passed through Timbuktu in 1352 when it was a small, bustling town. It had not then attained the importance it would a couple of centuries later as a major trading centre where camel trains passed through on their way from the west coast to many points in Africa.
In Mali, Ibn Battuta commented on the piety of the Moslems he encountered. Apparently, the mosques were so full that fathers would send their sons early to reserve a place for them for Friday prayers. Apart from being an important trading centre, Timbuktu was also a focal point of Islamic scholarship with three universities and 180 Koranic schools. Many stunning mosques were built there, as were imposing shrines to Sufi saints and other holy men.
Gradually, Timbuktu lost its importance to the point where its name became synonymous with a remote, almost mythical place. 'From here to Timbuktu' is an expression denoting a huge distance. Nevertheless, this did not prevent Dr A.Q. Khan, our very own nuclear proliferator, from visiting the now run-down town three times and apparently buying a hotel that he named after his wife, Hendrina.
Given its long history and striking architecture, it is no wonder that Timbuktu has been named a Unesco world heritage site. Sadly, this distinction has not stopped thugs of the Ansar Dine, or Defenders of the Faith, from destroying and damaging a number of ancient mosques and mausoleums.
Justifying their sacrilegious acts, an Ansar front man claimed that the design of the tombs was "idolatrous" as according to him, Islam prescribes about "the way and size in which tombs are built". This is news to me, but then I'm no Islamic scholar.
This wanton destruction of historically and religiously significant structures is reminiscent of the Taliban's demolition of the famous giant Buddha statues in Bamiyan. So outraged was the entire world at this criminal act of vandalism in early 2001 that even Moslem countries did not protest when the Taliban were attacked and sent packing later that year in the wake of 9/11.
Apart from their ignorance and brutality, the other thing the Taliban and the Ansar Dine have in common is their Wahabi/Salafi belief. This literalist Saudi tendency has seen the destruction of historically and religiously important buildings, including ancient tombs in Makkah and Madina. Entire historic sites have been bulldozed.
Curiously, most of the Moslem world has remained largely silent over this desecration. But none of this is new: the destruction of religious buildings has been going on in Soddy Arabia
...a kingdom taking up the bulk of the Arabian peninsula. Its primary economic activity involves exporting oil and soaking Islamic rubes on the annual hajj pilgrimage. The country supports a large number of princes in whatcha might call princely splendor. When the oil runs out the rest of the world is going to kick sand in their national face...
for centuries. Irfan Ahmad, who is associated with the Centre for Islam in the Modern World at Australia's Monash University, writing in Issue 15 of Islamica Magazine (now sadly defunct) informs us:
"In 1802, an army led by the sons of Mohammed Ibn Abd al-Wahab (the founder of Wahabism) and Mohammed ibn Saud occupied Taif and began a bloody massacre. A year later, the forces occupied the holy city of Makkah. They executed a campaign of destruction in many sacred places and levelled all the existing domes, even those built over the well of Zamzam... In 1806, the Wahabi army occupied Madina. They did not leave any religious building, including mosques, without demolishing it..."
...Salafists are ostentatiously devout Moslems who figure the ostentation of their piety gives them the right to tell others how to do it and to kill those who don't listen to them...
and other fundamentalists draw inspiration from the mediaeval scholar Ibn Taymiyyah to rationalise the destruction of ancient religious buildings.
This quotation from Ibn Taymiyyah is deployed by them to defend their antipathy towards ancient holy sites: "The leaders of Islam agreed that it is not permitted to build the mausoleums over the graves. They cannot be considered mosques and praying over them is not permitted."
Presumably, if these fundamentalists could have their way, most of the world's historical, religious and architectural heritage would have been levelled by now. Pyramids, temples and churches that have stood for centuries would have gone the way of the Bamiyan Buddhas.
Mughal contributions to civilisation like the Taj Mahal, and Istanbul's Ottoman Blue Mosque, would have been razed by the likes of the Taliban and the Ansar Dine. The exquisite Moorish buildings in Spain would have been blown up or bulldozed if the Salafis had their way.
Unsurprisingly, these hordes have little to contribute to learning and culture: they know only to kill and destroy. Rather than preserving the past and respecting the dead, they campaign to erase every vestige of history from memory except their version of it.
Oddly, they claim to speak exclusively for a religion that enjoins its followers to seek knowledge from the far corners of the world. In their view, any Moslem who differs from their narrow vision of the faith is a non-believer and therefore 'wajib-ul-qatal', or deserving to be put to death. They have thus appointed themselves judge, jury and hangman.
The Moslem mantra is that these Islamic fascisti are a small minority, and their views and actions should not colour the world's opinion about Islam as a whole. But the truth is that even a tiny fraction of some 1.3 billion Moslems amounts to enough dangerous beturbanned goons to cause havoc around the world.
In places like north Mali, north Nigeria, Yemen, Somalia, Afghanistan and large tracts of Pakistain, this cancer is spreading. Something all these areas have in common is a power vacuum that is being filled by jihad boy groups subscribing to the rigid, intolerant belief of Al Qaeda. Invariably, they follow the strict code of Salafism espoused by the Saudis.
Faced by these dangers, the Moslem world has opted for silence and supine inaction. In some cases, there is active if covert support from the state. Few raise their voices in protest. I suppose it's only a matter of time before Ibn Battuta's small mausoleum in Tangier is demolished, too.
Posted by: Fred