E-MAIL THIS LINK
To: 

3 Jamaat leaders asked to appear at tribunal on Feb 20
[Bangla Daily Star] The International Crimes Tribunal-2 yesterday asked three top Jamaat-e-Islami
...The Islamic Society, founded in 1941 in Lahore by Maulana Sayyid Abul Ala Maududi, aka The Great Apostosizer. The Jamaat opposed the independence of Bangladesh but has operated an independent branch there since 1975. It maintains close ties with international Mohammedan groups such as the Moslem Brotherhood. the Taliban, and al-Qaeda. The Jamaat's objectives are the establishment of a pure Islamic state, governed by Sharia law. It is distinguished by its xenophobia, and its opposition to Westernization, capitalism, socialism, secularism, and liberalist social mores...
leaders to explain why they would not face contempt of court charges for making provocative and derogatory remarks about the tribunal.

The three-member tribunal headed by Justice Obaidul Hassan asked the Jamaat leaders to appear before it to do the explaining on February 20.

The trio is Jamaat acting secretary general Rafiqul Islam Khan, its Central Executive Council member Hamidur Rahman Azad, also a politician, and its Dhaka City unit Assistant Secretary General Selim Uddin.

The tribunal issued the notice on the basis of the reports published in The Daily Star and Prothom Alo on February 5. The dailies published the reports over a Jamaat rally held in the city on February 4.

Bangla daily Prothom Alo quoted Selim Uddin as saying at a Jamaat rally in the capital on February 4: "There is no scope for the controversial tribunal to deliver any verdict if the country is to save from a civil war."

It quoted Azad as saying at the same programme, "This tribunal cannot exist anymore."

The Daily Star in a report headlined "Jamaat warns of civil war" quoted Rafiqul Islam as saying, "Don't push the country into a civil war by delivering one-sided verdicts against our leaders. If anything happens against Quader Mollah, every house will be on fire."

"People would even shed blood to resist vindictive verdicts by the international crimes tribunals," the daily further quoted Rafiqul.

Yesterday, the tribunal in its order said, "We have perused the remarks which appear to be extremely derogatory to the independence and image of a lawfully constituted court of law."

In the name of politics and saving a party man, no one, on any consideration, can threaten or warn of waging civil war in the event of any punishment to be awarded by a lawfully constituted tribunal, the tribunal said.

Posted by: Fred 2013-02-08
http://www.rantburg.com/poparticle.php?ID=361837