|
CIA fears Syria could go nuclear
INVESTIGATORS tracking the spread of nuclear technology and know-how through the clandestine sales network of the Pakistani scientist Abdul Qadeer Khan believe that Syria might have acquired centrifuges that can purify uranium for use in nuclear bombs. Khan, the so-called father of Pakistanâs nuclear programme, is known to have helped Iran, Libya and North Korea to acquire centrifuges and other nuclear components on the black market, but American intelligence sources believe his net was cast wider. A hero in his own country, Khan was sacked as President Pervez Musharrafâs special scientific adviser this year after admitting that he had passed on nuclear secrets to other countries.
John Bolton, the US undersecretary of state for arms control, has voiced fears that Khan had âseveral otherâ customers seeking to acquire the bomb. âThere is more out there than we can discuss publicly,â he told the United Nations in April. âItâs one of the reasons why the depth of our concern about the international black market in weapons of mass destruction is as substantial as it is.â Danielle Pletka, an expert on Middle Eastern nuclear proliferation at the American Enterprise Institute, said: âThereâs very wide suspicion that Syria was part of the A Q Khan network.â The scientist visited Syria in the late 1990s and is thought to have met Syrian officials secretly in Iran. Pletka claims the scientist cut a deal with Musharraf, limiting his confession to the three countries that were already proven to be part of his nuclear sales ring while avoiding mention of three other interested parties: Syria, Egypt and Saudi Arabia.
âThe Syrians have long had a chemical weapons programme but to the best of peopleâs knowledge never had a nuclear programme, but there is mounting evidence that this is no longer the case,â Pletka said. The CIA reported to Congress last year that it viewed âSyrian nuclear intentions with growing concernâ. Recent intelligence intercepts suggest that Syria not only might have acquired centrifuges, but might be operating them. Opinion is divided in the intelligence community as to the extent of the threat. The American State Department said: âThe United States government has consistently outlined our concerns with regard to Syriaâs pursuit of weapons of mass destruction. We are very interested to learn the scope of the A Q Khan network, but we are not in a position to say with certainty that Syria has centrifuges.â Bolton has been frustrated by limited co-operation from Khan and his associates. âIf part of that network is exposed, you donât really know whether youâve exposed all of it or not, or brought it down,â he said earlier this year.
| The Paks won't let us question Khan directly, and the Malayians have kept a tight lid over Tahir, so far. |
Tensions with Syria have been ratcheted up by the conflict in Iraq. There are concerns that the Syrians are letting fighters, terrorists and weapons cross its borders and the prospect, however distant, of a nuclear-armed Baâathist state is particularly chilling to Americans. The acquisition of centrifuges would be an important step towards obtaining the weapons-grade material needed to develop a nuclear bomb. âItâs no secret the Syrians have historically sought an answer to Israelâs overwhelming conventional superiority and have an active biological and chemical weapons programme,â said Steven Cook, of the Council on Foreign Relations. âIf they could acquire a nuclear option it would shift the strategic situation in the region.â Cook doubts, however, that Syria has the capacity and infrastructure to produce a nuclear bomb, even if it has acquired some of the technology. âTheyâd still be looking to buy missiles,â he said.
| Earth to Steve, Syria builds Scuds, that's all they need to hit Israel. |
President George Bush imposed trade sanctions on Syria last month, claiming that its actions posed an âunusual and extraordinary threat to the national security, foreign policy and economyâ of America. He accused Syria of pursuing weapons of mass destruction and missiles, in particular advanced chemical weapons capabilities.
Posted by: Mark Espinola 2004-07-07 |
