|
Archives Staff Was Suspicious of Berger
via WaPo - EFLLogin: gnafgnnsy1@lnubb.org / gnafgnnsy By John F. Harris and Susan Schmidt - Thursday, July 22, 2004  Last Oct. 2, former Clinton national security adviser Samuel R. "Sandy" Berger stayed huddled over papers at the National Archives until 8 p.m.What he did not know as he labored through that long Thursday was that the same Archives employees who were solicitously retrieving documents for him were also watching their important visitor with a suspicious eye. After Berger's previous visit, in September, Archives officials believed documents were missing. This time, they specially coded the papers to more easily tell whether some went missing, said government officials and legal sources familiar with the case. The notion of one of Washington's most respected foreign policy figures being subjected to treatment that had at least a faint odor of a sting operation is a strange one. But the peculiarities -- and conflicting versions of events and possible motives -- were just then beginning in a case that this week bucked Berger out of an esteemed position as a leader of the Democratic government-in-waiting that had assembled around presidential nominee John F. Kerry. ...more... Word is, of the big MSM outlets, WaPo stands out for deciding to play this story straight and above board. We shall see, but perhaps this is the first step in the WaPo rehab... Nahhh, I don't think so, either - the barn's full of idiots. Prolly some sort of war between the turf queens. Posted by: .com 2004-07-22 |
| http://www.rantburg.com/poparticle.php?ID=38708 |