Charlottesville police find no evidence in U-Va. sexual assault case
[WASHINGTONPOST] CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA. -- Police here say they have found no evidence to support claims in a Rolling Stone article that a University of Virginia student was gang raped at a campus fraternity in September 2012, noting that months of investigation led detectives to discredit several claims about the alleged assault.
One of these days we're going to reach a point where nobody believes any claims of this type, legitimate or not. That will probably be ascribed to sexism.
Police Chief Timothy J. Longo on Monday afternoon said the police department had multiple meetings with "Jackie" -- the woman who claimed she was gang raped at a fraternity party -- and that she declined to speak about the alleged incident or provide any information about it. Numerous lines of inquiry yielded evidence that the fraternity did not have a party the night of the alleged attack, and police were unable to find anyone matching the description of the alleged attacker.
Then we'll head toward the point where we'll have copycats of non-existent crimes.
"We're not able to conclude to any substantive degree that an incident occurred at the Phi Kappa Psi fraternity house or any other fraternity house, for that matter," Longo said at a news conference. "That doesn't mean something terrible didn't happen to Jackie ... we're just not able to gather sufficient facts to determine what that is."
Then we'll start making up our own morality as we go along...
The announcement came after a five-month investigation spurred by allegations of a brutal fraternity house gang-rape described in a 9,000-word magazine account that went viral online in November. The Rolling Stone report unraveled under scrutiny, as the accuser's version of events was publicly challenged by her friends, members of the fraternity and sexual assault advocates on campus. After Washington Post reports revealed flaws in the account, Rolling Stone's editors backed away from it.
Oh. Wait.
Longo's statement was the first official discrediting of the account, but he said he would keep the investigation open in case witnesses wanted to come forward with anything that might lead police to any information about an attack.
Posted by: Fred 2015-03-24 |