|
America's military faces the most thankless task in the history of warfare.
I read this in the print version last week and wanted to post it. I hope someone did not previously do so. A couple of other points are that the Indian Wars were fought by an all-volunteer force. The U. S. conducted the wars over a period of decades. There were domestic factions that were against the war from the same regions, but never to the extent they are today. The wars ended at Wounded Knee as a result of media exposure.An overlooked truth about the war on terrorism, and the war in Iraq in particular, is that they both arrived too soon for the American military: before it had adequately transformed itself from a dinosaurian, Industrial Age beast to a light and lethal instrument skilled in guerrilla warfare, attuned to the local environment in the way of the 19th-century Apaches. My mention of the Apaches is deliberate. For in a world where mass infantry invasions are becoming politically and diplomatically prohibitive--even as dirty little struggles proliferate, featuring small clusters of combatants hiding out in Third World slums, deserts and jungles--the American military is back to the days of fighting the Indians. The red Indian metaphor is one with which a liberal policy nomenklatura may be uncomfortable, but Army and Marine field officers have embraced it because it captures perfectly the combat challenge of the early 21st century. But they don't mean it as a slight against the Native North Americans. The fact that radio call signs so often employ Indian names is an indication of the troops' reverence for them. Posted by: Mrs. Davis 2004-09-26 |
| http://www.rantburg.com/poparticle.php?ID=44285 |