|
Hillary Clinton's Campaign Needs To Hire Better Liars
[The Federalist] Hillary Clinton’s campaign has a problem. A truth problem, to be specific. No, not the problem of being completely incapable of ever telling the truth, although that is a problem. The truth problem I’m talking about is the Clinton campaign’s inability to tell believable lies."But why not just ask the Clinton campaign to tell the truth?" you might ask. "Wouldn’t that be easier?" Maybe. But these are the Clintons. If you’re a Clinton, you lie. It’s what you do. Expecting them to not lie is a fool’s errand. But given the amount of time the Clintons have spent in politics lying to the public‐somewhere in the neighborhood of three decades‐they really ought to be better at it by now. For those who’ve been living under a rock, people have been asking questions about the aging Democratic nominee’s health ever since a potentially life-threatening blood clot near her brain was discovered after the former Secretary of State suffered a serious concussion that sidelined her for several weeks. According to the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Clinton blamed that concussion for her alleged inability to recall details about her lawless e-mail server scheme. Here are a few headlines that captured the rough tenor of coverage of Hillary’s health woes over the past few weeks: CNN (Aug. 24, 2016): Clinton’s health is fine, but what about Trump? New York Post (Sept. 4, 2016): Dr. Drew loses show after discussing Hillary’s health Washington Post (Sept. 6, 2016): Can we just stop talking about Hillary Clinton’s health now? Sarah Silverman (Sept. 8, 2016): "I think anyone bringing up her health is a f***ing a**hole" The wheels officially came off the bus on Sunday when Hillary Clinton seized up and passed out on camera. Suddenly, asking questions about her health no longer indicted you as an un-person who should be sent off to the re-education camps. Posted by: Besoeker 2016-09-13 |
| http://www.rantburg.com/poparticle.php?ID=467400 |