|
Reply to Skidmark on pedophilia (not linked)
I don't know that the hell goes on, but my posts on the subject just disappear. Usually, I just go on, but this thing is (IMO) connected to Kavanaugh story. So Skid I tried to reply to your posts on the linked article but my posts just disappeared. So briefly (I'm familiar with the subject because I used to write students' term papers for a living - one of these papers was on pedophilia): (1) The whole subject of pedophilia & child abuse involves a lot of hysterics and overly ambitious prosecutors. cf. Henning, P. J. (1999). Prosecutorial Misconduct in Grand Jury Investigations. South Carolina Law Review, 51(1). (2) Like most porn watchers, pedophile porn users are not active in "real world" cf. Lee, A. F. et al., (2012). Predicting hands-on child sexual offenses among possessors of Internet child pornography. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 18(4), 644. Possessors of child porn are persecuted over harm to child "actors", not because they're dangerous to children. If materials do not involve actual children, IMO, no crime. (3) Wanna bet the next Dem attack on pub candidates will involve charges of pedophilia? Posted by: g(r)omgoru 2018-10-05 |
| http://www.rantburg.com/poparticle.php?ID=524834 |