E-MAIL THIS LINK
To: 

Progressives Don't Care if the Poor Get Poorer, So Long As They Gain Power
[PolitiChicks] Progressive policies pretty much always result in the same thing: the poor stay poor, the middle class gets poorer, and the rich stay rich ‐ even if a little less so.

It reminds me of something Margaret Thatcher said 23 years ago of liberals, "They would rather the poor were poorer, provided that the rich were less rich." Thatcher’s comment is as true today as it was then.

Isn’t it interesting that despite the reliable failure of progressive policies, they continue their dogged advocacy of doubling down?

It’s even more mystifying given that so many progressive Democrats are indeed themselves rich elites. If you’re rich, why push an agenda designed to make yourself "a little less rich?"

Some blame it on liberal guilt. Others claim it’s do-gooderism. But if either of these motives are true, then why push policies that impoverish everyone else? Neither guilt nor good intentions can possibly be satisfied by hurting others.

I have a different explanation. To me it looks like it’s all a grab for political power.

I say that first because a recurring historical pattern shows elites of nearly any ideological stripe ‐ whether monied or intellectual ‐ tend to desire control over their neighbors. In fact, it seems power over others is one of those common maladies of the human heart that mobilizes and motivates every bit as much as lust or greed.
Posted by: Besoeker 2019-06-30
http://www.rantburg.com/poparticle.php?ID=544577