Pretty much. https://t.co/92NsfFE9fk

— Eric Berger (@SciGuySpace) January 27, 2020

The Coalition for Deep Space Exploration weighs in on the House’s NASA authorization bill, saying it’s “helping to spark a robust exchange” on how to achieve the long term goal of humans to Mars. [That much is certain.] pic.twitter.com/KeUFSyYjB1

— Jeff Foust (@jeff_foust) January 27, 2020

This is ridiculous; Boeing thinks it can still follow the 1960's paradigm of billion-dollars-a-flight space missions?

— Michael Hutson (@michael_hutson) January 27, 2020

Boeing bailout plan is in place. And disguised. https://t.co/CDEvSnQ2sG

— Bilal Zuberi (@bznotes) January 27, 2020

As @CHenry_SN reported last Friday, Boeing believes there’s a “very low likelihood” other satellites could suffer the same problem as Spaceway-1. https://t.co/btMjz95Ykv https://t.co/3el3Q0aXfN

— Jeff Foust (@jeff_foust) January 27, 2020

I hadn't even thought about it in this way!
It would make sense as Boeing has had a string of failures recently, and poor performance would hurt its fulfilment of US government contracts in the military sector.

— ToughSF (@ToughSf) January 27, 2020

A balanced evaluation of the new NASA appropriations bill: "If we are going to explore Mars in a safe and sustainable way, we will require a strong in situ resource utilization capability and significant technology development using the surface of the Moon." https://t.co/M4oQD5XzEY

— Dr. Phil Metzger (@DrPhiltill) January 27, 2020