|
Reps. Peter DeFazio (D-Ore.) and Rick Larsen (D-Wash.) attempt to halt SpaceX development.
[SpaceNews] Congress raises concerns about FAA’s handling of Starship launch license violationAs SpaceX gears up for another test flight of a Starship prototype, the Federal Aviation Administration is facing new scrutiny from Congress for how it handled SpaceX’s violation of its launch license on an earlier test flight. SpaceX had planned to launch its SN11 Starship vehicle March 29 from its Boca Chica, Texas, test site. That flight will be similar to those of previous Starship prototypes, going to an altitude of 10 kilometers before landing on a nearby pad. However, SpaceX called off the March 29 launch attempt because an FAA inspector could not arrive to observe the flight during a five-hour window. “FAA inspector unable to reach Starbase in time for launch today,” tweeted Elon Musk, chief executive of SpaceX, using the proposed new name for the Boca Chica site. “Postponed to no earlier than tomorrow.” The requirement for an FAA presence on site at the test site is new for the SN11 launch. The latest version of SpaceX’s FAA launch license for the Starship suborbital test flight program, issued March 12, allows those test flights to take place “only when an FAA Safety Inspector is present at SpaceX’s Boca Chica launch and landing site.” The FAA cleared SpaceX to proceed with launches, with SN9 and SN10 launching and landing — and both exploding upon or shortly after landing — on Feb. 2 and March 3, respectively. Neither caused any damage outside of the SpaceX test site. The FAA’s response to SpaceX’s launch license violation, including the lack of any penalties beyond the investigation, prompted criticism from two key members of Congress. In a March 25 letter to FAA Administrator Steve Dickson, Reps. Peter DeFazio (D-Ore.) and Rick Larsen (D-Wash.) sought to “register our concerns” with the incident. DeFazio is chair of the House Transportation Committee and Larsen the chair of its aviation subcommittee. “Given the high-risk nature of the industry, we are disappointed that the FAA declined to conduct an independent review of the event and, to the best of our knowledge, has not pursued any form of enforcement action,” they wrote after summarizing the incident and investigation. In the letter, DeFazio and Larsen called on the FAA to “resist any potential undue influence on launch safety decision-making” by taking “all the time and actions necessary” to evaluate proposed launches. They also urged the FAA to implement “a strict policy to deal with violations of FAA launch and reentry licenses” that includes civil penalties, and to evaluate its current approach to safety oversight and enforcement for commercial space activities. Related: Peter DeFazio: 2020-10-19 Portland protests drive powerful Dem's Oregon district toward young Republican rival Peter DeFazio: 2010-12-08 Liberals Try to Prevent Pelosi From Bringing Tax Bill to the Floor Peter DeFazio: 2010-11-17 Nancy Pelosi: The Gift That Keeps on Giving! Related: Steve Dickson: 2021-02-22 FAA Demands Boing 777 Engine Inspections Steve Dickson: 2020-12-30 US to Allow Small Drones to Fly Over People at Night Related: Federal Aviation Administration: 2021-02-22 FAA Demands Boing 777 Engine Inspections Federal Aviation Administration: 2020-12-30 US to Allow Small Drones to Fly Over People at Night Federal Aviation Administration: 2020-09-20 The Criminal Prosecution of Boeing Executives Should Begin Related: SpaceX: 2021-03-11 Musk explains SN10 explosion SpaceX: 2021-03-09 SpaceX FCC request to allow StarLink to service mobile subscribers SpaceX: 2021-03-06 A cyberpunk scene at SpaceX's launch facilities: A robot dog inspected the wreckage of a Starship rocket prototype Posted by: 3dc 2021-03-30 |
| http://www.rantburg.com/poparticle.php?ID=598207 |