Cross-Examining the Climate Change Cultists
[Townhal] An opinion by your favorite attorney, Kurt.
If you want to watch the pinkos fret, simply state the indisputable truth that what they call "climate change" is a massive hoax. Their fallback is inevitably that "science" — which they purport to love except when it demonstrates that there are only men and women and that you can’t change the sex you are born as — has decreed that because we peons insist on not living in caves like primitive tribesmen (okay, non-binary tribespeople) the Earth is going to cook. And, of course, the only solution is to do a whole bunch of things that leftists always wanted to do anyway. There’s no time to think, no time to reflect, and certainly no time to argue. Why, who are you to question the scientists?
Well, I’m a lawyer. I question scientists for a living.
You want a lawyer who, besides making his own case, takes the evidence from the other side and slices and dices it. Cross-examination, it has been said, is the greatest engine for the discovery of the truth man has yet created. And when someone wants to prevent vigorous, even brutal cross-examination of his case, that’s a giveaway that it is weak.
Looking at you, Liz Cheney, you malignant creep.
And I’m looking at the climate change hoax. The weather cultists even have a uniquely dumb and offensive slur for people who dare test their evidence, such as it is: "Denier."
I think I'll print out his 'cross-examination' and carry a copy in my pocket, in case any krazy klimate kultist brings it up.
Posted by: Bobby 2022-07-28 |