E-MAIL THIS LINK
To: 

Why should Regional Judges have the authority to unilaterally dictate to the President
[X] Random federal judges in blue state backwaters have no authority to unilaterally dictate who the President may talk to or what data he can access. John Roberts and SCOTUS have two options here: they can bring these inferior malcontents to heel, or they can get used to the President simply ignoring these inferior courts or Congress eliminating them entirely.

Congress created these inferior courts so the Supreme Court wouldn’t have to deal with every federal case by itself. But if these rogue inferior judges are going to routinely issue lawless decisions that the Supreme Court has to deal with anyway, Congress would be well within its rights to just eliminate them.

Roberts and SCOTUS can immediately put these lawless judges in their place, or Roberts can watch his caseload go up 1000x and his court’s precious perceived legitimacy crater overnight.

The age of tolerating this nonsense is over.
District Federal Judges should be limited to their district regional cases and legal issues.When the President issues an Executive Orders it is a NATIONAL Issue and if challenged, it should be solely address by the US Supreme Court.

Also, any judgment by the SCOTUS must be required to cite where in the US Constitution such a ruling justified. We must be a Nation ran and operated under the US Constitution, not politically or DEI mind people.




Posted by: NN2N1 2025-02-11
http://www.rantburg.com/poparticle.php?ID=739896