|
U.S. urged to withdraw troops from S. Korea
The New Communist Party of Great Britain issued a statement titled "U.S., Hands Off the Korean Peninsula" on Nov. 25. A hair-trigger situation is now prevailing in the Korean Peninsula due to the U.S. unilateral and arrogant nuclear racket, the statement said, branding the racket as a vicious act of harassing peace and stability in Asia and the rest of the world. Golly. I agree with Communists on something. And who has their finger on the Pulse of the West like the New Communist Party of Great Britain, which is chock full of brand New Communists? The statement Concluding a non-aggression treaty between the DPRK and the U.S. as proposed by the DPRK is the most reasonable and realistic way of ensuring peace and security on the Korean Peninsula and settling the DPRK-U.S. relations. No it's not... The army-based policy of Kim Jong Il, the great leader of the Korean people, is the only treasured sword for defending world peace and security and saving the Korean nation as well as all humankind from nuclear holocaust by the U.S. imperialists. Yep. That's all that's holding our aggression at bay... The statement called upon the world peace-loving people to more vigorously come out in the drive to build an independent and peaceful new world by resolutely condemning the U.S. nuclear racket and positively solidarizing with the grand march of the Korean nation for independent reunification and the anti-U.S. struggle of the South Korean people for independence. All you Peace Lovers⢠out there, line up behind the Dear Leader... The statement urged the U.S. to halt its reckless nuclear racket at once, accede to concluding a non-aggression treaty between the DPRK and the U.S. without delay and immediately withdraw all its aggression troops and nuclear weapons from South Korea. Well, I'm for dumping SKor. I kinda like our nuclear racket â makes me feel powerful, y'know? And as for a non-aggression pact between the U.S. and NKor â why? If they don't adhere to their agreements, why would another agreement be necessary? Posted by: Fred Pruitt 2002-12-19 |
| http://www.rantburg.com/poparticle.php?ID=8624 |