| Submit your comments on this article |
| Iraq |
| Three mystery ships are tracked over suspected ’weapons’ cargo |
| 2003-02-18 |
| From the Al-Independent, so use a jumbo grain of salt: Three giant cargo ships are being tracked by US and British intelligence on suspicion that they might be carrying Iraqi weapons of mass destruction. Each with a deadweight of 35,000 to 40,000 tonnes, the ships have been sailing around the world's oceans for the past three months while maintaining radio silence in clear violation of international maritime law, say authoritative shipping industry sources. I thought international law only applied to the US. Besides, maybe their radios are just broken The vessels left port in late November, just a few days after UN weapons inspectors led by Hans Blix began their search for the alleged Iraqi arsenal on their return to the country. Just a coincidence. Nothing here. Please move on now, we're trying to fix that darn radio. The ships were chartered by a shipping agent based in Egypt and are flying under the flags of three different countries. The continued radio silence since they left port, in addition to the captains' failure to provide information on their cargoes or their destinations, is a clear breach of international maritime laws. The vessels are thought to have spent much of their time in the deep waters of the Indian Ocean, berthing at sea when they need to collect supplies of fuel and food. They have berthed in a handful of Arab countries, including Yemen. American and British military forces are believed to be reluctant to stop and search the vessels for fear that any intervention might result in them being scuttled. If they were carrying chemical and biological weapons, or fissile nuclear material, and they were to be sunk at sea, the environmental damage could be catastrophic. About 1 ten-quadrillionth as catastrophic as if they were to be delivered. A shipping industry source told The Independent: "If Iraq does have weapons of mass destruction, then a very large part of its capability could be afloat on the high seas right now. These ships have maintained radio silence for long periods and, for a considerable time, they have been steaming around in ever-decreasing circles." The ships are thought to have set sail from a country other than Iraq to avoid running the gauntlet of Western naval vessels patrolling the Gulf. Defence experts believe that, if they are carrying weapons of mass destruction, these could have been smuggled out through Syria or Jordan. The Syria theory has been around for weeks. |
| Posted by:JAB |
| #1 Put a 688 on the tail of each one. If they get within 500 miles of anything important (e.g., Diego Garcia or better) we just have to take the shot. Reminds me of a Mike Wallace interview long ago with the Shah of Iran. Apparently the Shah had complained to the Soviet Ambassador about high-altitude overflights from the Soviet side into Iranian airspace. The ambassador categorically denied that the aircraft were Russian and said that his country had no knowledge of them. To which the Shah replied, "if these are not your airplanes, then surely you will not object if I shoot them down." The overflights stopped. Lesson: if the ships don't have identifiable owners, are flying flags of convenience, and don't respond to hails, then no one can complain should we find it necessary to sink them. |
| Posted by: Steve White 2003-02-19 00:03:16 |