You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Iraq
Weapon that could transform the war
2003-03-09
Forget the laser targeted JDAMs and Hellfires: the real transformation in the American military has come in a far more mundane area: transportation.

The US now has the ability to fly 70-ton battle tanks over huge distances. This means that America is less reliant on bases in the region to support an invasion of Iraq. It is a key transformation that is as much of a breakthrough today as the technique of dropping parachute troops far behind enemy lines was in the Second World War. Then paratroopers had to wait for their tanks to catch up overland. Today's US Air Force can fly in the tanks too, radically changing the strategic realities of land and air war.

The key piece of equipment is the Boeing C-17 Globemaster transport plane. First introduced in 1993, the C-17 can carry the 70-ton M1 Abrams main battle tank, smaller M2 Bradley tanks and even helicopters. Most importantly the C-17 can land on dirt airstrips and on short runways of 3,000 feet. Traditional transporters can do neither.

Put the C17's capabilities together and it means that the Pentagon can fly tanks into short dirt airstrips in the middle of nowhere. This means that airstrips in northern Iraq can be used, if time allows, to launch armoured attacks. The US Air Force has specialist Red Horse teams whose job is to clear and repair an airstrip rapidly, or when necessary make one from scratch. Helicopter-borne troops can seize an airfield and then, as they expand around the base, transport aircraft begin to arrive.

The C-17s can come in one after the other, like passenger planes dropping down to Heathrow. The armour they disgorge will give a hardened spine of reassurance to otherwise lightly armed parachute troops. But though transporting large numbers of tanks in this way would put too much strain even on US resources, the M1 Abrams is the undoubted king of the battlefield and only a few would give massive support to the rest of any invasion force. In 1991 the most dramatic US operation was a drive of 100 miles by Airborne forces north from Kuwait.
What's the old saying — bad generals think tactics, good generals think strategy, great generals think logistics?
Posted by:Steve White

#2  The C-17 is also vulnerable to ground fire. Even a half dozen lucky shots with a mega guage rifle could cause big time damage.
Posted by: mhw   2003-03-09 10:29:07  

#1  He who gets ther the"fastest with the mostest"wins.
Posted by: raptor   2003-03-09 06:18:23  

00:00