You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Iraq
Airstrike may have killed Saddam
2003-04-08
A U.S. Air Force warplane dropped four enormous bombs Monday on a residential complex where “extremely reliable” intelligence indicated that Iraqi President Saddam Hussein and one or both of his sons were attending a meeting, senior administration officials told NBC News. The sources would not rule out the possibility that Saddam could have moved before the bomber struck, but they said it was likely that he and his sons were dead.

BASED ON information from an intelligence source on the ground in Baghdad, U.S. military officials were confident that Saddam and his son Qusay were attending a meeting in the neighborhood with other top Iraqi leaders, senior officials told NBC’s Carl Rochelle at the Pentagon and Andrea Mitchell at the State Department. They said they believed it was possible that Saddam’s other son, Uday, also was there. The intelligence information was considered so reliable that it justified a massive attack in a residential area of the al-Mansour district of western Baghdad despite the administration’s declared emphasis on avoiding civilian casualties, diplomatic and military sources said.

Officials quickly called in an Air Force B-1B bomber to strike the location. At 2 p.m. (6 a.m. ET), the warplane dropped four GBU-31 Joint Direct Attack Munition weapons, the 2,000-pound smart bombs known as “bunker busters,” leaving giant holes in the ground, the officials said. Diplomatic officials and officials at the Pentagon told NBC News that they were highly confident that they killed most of the people at the meeting, but they said it could take a day or two before they knew for sure. The airstrike was confirmed by senior administration officials at the White House and military officials at U.S. Central Command forward headquarters in Doha, Qatar. The officials would not comment on the possible effect of the airstrike, but officials in Qatar said that the atmosphere at Central Command was one of “confidence” and that more information could be released in the coming hours.

Senior U.S. officials have told NBC News that Saddam’s likely successor, assuming Qusay Hussein was not available to take command, would be Izzat Ibrahim, vice chairman of the Revolutionary Command Council. The sources said Ibrahim was believed to be in Mosul in northern Iraq in recent weeks, not in Baghdad.

The air raid in al-Mansour, a stronghold of Saddam’s Baath Party, blasted a 60-foot-deep crater, ripped orange trees from their roots and left behind a heap of concrete, mangled iron rods and shredded furniture and clothes. Witnesses said nine Iraqis were killed. If Saddam was among them, U.S. military planners would have achieved one of their prime objectives in the war. It would cap a dramatic day in which U.S. forces established a foothold in one of Saddam’s palaces in Baghdad after swooping into the city the day before and moving to cut off escape routes from the capital.
Posted by:Bent Pyramid

#10  Maybe it was for the roaches? that's why the camps were empty
Posted by: Frank G   2003-04-08 19:27:16  

#9  One report I heard said the chemicals were found one block away from a terrorist training camp. Pesticides were found inside the camp as well.
Posted by: Jon   2003-04-08 17:57:06  

#8  Is it true that, in a gesture of fence-mending, Villepan offered us a sample of Saddam's DNA taken from Jacques Chirac's lips?
Posted by: tbn   2003-04-08 17:08:36  

#7  How come if one of these barrels of pesticides were stored next to a day-care center here in North American, the Lefty-Greens would be screaming murder, WMD, the end of the world? Bet they'll scream about this now? No.
Posted by: Don   2003-04-08 09:28:23  

#6  If you read the fine print on the pesticide bottles at your local garden store, it'll scare the hell out of you. The symptoms of exposure are exactly those of the nerve agents taught in the NBC training classes I received.
Posted by: Steve   2003-04-08 09:21:03  

#5  Is Info Man scheduled for his press conference today? I'm interested on how he tries to spin this thing. Or has even he given up?
Posted by: tu3031   2003-04-08 09:19:23  

#4  Many commercially available pesticides work in the same manner as nerve agents, but are chemically/physically tailored to kill pests (non-human) better than they kill people. Vice-versa for nerve agents. In a pinch, these pesticides can be used as never agents to kill people. The antidotes for accidental nerve-agent like pesticide intoxication (atropine, pralidoxime or 2-PAM) are the same as those used by the military for nerve gas exposure.
Posted by: Tresho   2003-04-08 08:42:09  

#3  Perhaps commercially available pesticides can be chemically transformed into nerve agents? I'd have to bone up on my chemistry to be sure. That way they wouldn't obviously be buying precursor chemicals.
Posted by: Bent Pyramid   2003-04-08 07:16:41  

#2  Earlier Monday, the military was led to a site in a city near Baghdad where suspicious chemical compounds were stored, but subsequent tests proved negative, military sources told Reuters.


Even though the stuff discovered is supposedly pesticides, I wonder why it was stored in a military looking depot. Even if it isn't accepted as a Chemical Weapon, its effects on people are so equivalent, that one wonders if Saddam and Company went on a search for suitable, POTENTIALLY dual-use chemicals. After all, Zyklon B, the gas used by the Nazis in the concentration camps, was originally marketed as an effective verim killer and disinfectant, no?
Posted by: Ptah   2003-04-08 07:10:57  

#1  Let's hold back on ululating and the distribution of candy to children until we're sure we hit them...
Posted by: Brian   2003-04-08 07:08:47  

00:00