You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Iraq
Kirkuk Falls
2003-04-10
Reports from the northern Iraqi city of Kirkuk say US-backed Kurdish troops have entered the city. Kurdish troops told a BBC correspondent there that they met some resistance, but were then greeted by crowds in the centre of the city. Our correspondent reported witnessing scenes of celebrations as she arrived in the important oil city. "I've just arrived in Kirkuk. I am surrounded by crowds of people. They're celebrating what appears to be the fall of Kirkuk," said Dumeetha Luthra who is travelling with US special forces. "I was told that it fell half an hour ago and that Kurdish soldiers are being greeted by people from Kirkuk."
Posted by:Paul Moloney

#19  Hey Murat, you're right. It appears we screwed you over.

Two can tango. We torpedoed your economy, we voided our promises about the Kurds. You stopped us with the 4ID.

Where is your Allah to save your Republic now?
Posted by: Brian   2003-04-10 21:29:09  

#18  It appears, murat, that circumstances forced the Kurds to move prematurely. If Turkey had agreed to what the US wanted, these would have been American soldiers instead.

I don't take lightly the breaking of a promise: I hope the Kurds cooperate and leave as US Soldiers arrive. The value of their keeping their word, at this point, is all they'll have going to for them for a while.

The Kurds are smart: they'll settle for a Federal solution with their boundaries drawn so that local leaders will be Kurds since they will have the support of a Kurdish majority. This'll be the best deal they've had in the past two millenia. It won't be all that much different from the English colonial governments in the New world that learned the art of self-governance

I don't think Murat, and Turkey, are worried about the Kurds failing in their quest for self-governance. I think, honestly, that they're worried that the Kurds will succeed. Unlike Arafat, they're willing to take half a loaf now, build their strength from that half a loaf, and go for more of the loaf later.
Posted by: Ptah   2003-04-10 14:29:28  

#17  Turkey gave us overflight rights through their airspace. Later in the war they allowed us to move "non-lethal" supplies over the ground. They have agreed to stay out, as requested, so far.

They ARE a model of democracy for the Muslim world, and have been very helpful in afghanistan.

We will need them in the future, and while we perhaps dont need to reward them now, it would not be wise to alienate them either.

As for Murat, disregard him.
Posted by: liberalhawk   2003-04-10 11:53:19  

#16  
They are still strategically important to us vs. Syria and it would be preferable to finesse this situation than to get into a shooting war with a NATO ally, especially such a formidable one.


If they were an ally, yes they would be important. I, however, believe that the "bait and switch" with the Turks was a crafty plan to delay our attack and allow more time for Saddam and the Iraqis to at least kill some more Americans and teach us a lesson while appearing to "stand up" to the Great Satan. You can see the same thing going on with Jordan. They are "supporting" the US, but shipping armaments to Saddam's regime.

I am very cynical regarding Muslim nations--like Turkey--and their "support" for the US. Certainly, they are our ally when we are helping protect them, but when push comes to shove, the Turkish people--and therefore the Turkish government--will blindly trash their futures on a brutal dictator simply because he is Muslim and we are infidels.

The thing that really chaps my ass; after giving us a royal shafting, they will continue to whine about the hardship placed on them, and how they are entitled to American money.
The Kurds, regardless of what happened between them and the Turks, have chosen to help. That makes them an ally in this war.
Those that hinder us, by default, help our enemy.
Helping the enemy does not make you an ally.





Posted by: Celissa   2003-04-10 11:33:14  

#15  Name of Turkish unlimited hydroplane racer:

Miss Calculate
Posted by: Alaska Paul   2003-04-10 11:00:06  

#14  It shows only how right Turkey was to distrust the US and the words of Bush and Powell.
Posted by: Murat 4/10/2003 4:53:04 AM

Murat you are in a fantasy land. Turkey had it's chance but she wanted to pound her chest. Your leaders were given very bad advice, that the united states could not and would not take Iraq without Turkish support. So we relied more on the Kurds, and how wrong is this? These people have gotten the short end of the deal for a thousand years. Your just upset you cannot beat up on the Kurds of Northern Iraq anymore without coming into direct confrontation with the United States. And you know Turked did it to herself. Last year I would of never of thouhgt we would be abandoned by one of our best allies (past tense). And I also would of never of said this, LONG LIVE KURDISTAN!
Posted by: Dan   2003-04-10 10:53:54  

#13  Murat: cypriots kurds armenians
Posted by: Frank G   2003-04-10 10:46:01  

#12  latest reports

Turks "watching" the situation
US promises to send US forces in to occupy Kirkuk (173rd AB, or 1st ID?)
Peshmerga promise to leave soon(when the Yanks show up in force?)
Baathists in fighting retreat south toward Tikrit.
Situation should settle down soon.
Posted by: liberalhawk   2003-04-10 09:33:49  

#11  I notice that Murat didnt respond to my post!

The Kurds are historically the persecuted and friendless people of the Middle East. Well now they have the most powerful nation in the world as their friends.

Turkey is afraid and justifiably so! As Iran and Syria should be also. If the Kurds now persuade their new best friends that the Kurds should be liberated then for the US it becomes a matter of principle!

I've just heared on CNN that Colin Powell has said that US forces will remove Kurdish forces from Kirkut. As much as I respect CP, this is dumb dumb! To date Kirkut is the only Iraqi city liberated by Iraqis. Using US forces to reverse this would be a PR disaster - justifiably so!
Posted by: Phil B   2003-04-10 09:25:25  

#10  It would be unwise for us to give up on Turkey just yet. They are still strategically important to us vs. Syria and it would be preferable to finesse this situation than to get into a shooting war with a NATO ally, especially such a formidable one.

The Turks have some legit issues here. They have been victims of Kurdish terrorism, for instance. However, they badly misplayed the situation vs. Iraq and will now have to watch the Kurds benefit from their miscalculation. Hopefully the Kurds will help us orchestrate the occupation of the Kirkuk oil fields in such a way that the Turks are deprived of another opportunity to make a strategic blunder. It would be in the best interest of all parties concerned.
Posted by: JAB   2003-04-10 08:53:57  

#9  Turkey is finished as an important ally of the US. It's nothing personal, they just don't matter that much anymore with the demise of the Soviet Union and Ba'athist Iraq.

z
Posted by: ziphius   2003-04-10 08:27:41  

#8  C'mon, Murat, cross that border now and say hi to the US Army. C'mon over! The 4ID is getting in a little late and would like some action. I'm sure they'd be more than happy to welcome our bait-and-switch Turkish friends.
Posted by: Dar   2003-04-10 08:13:37  

#7  What's this talk about distrust? The Kurds aren't taking any Turkish territory,are they?You,Murat,sound like there was a deal between Turkey and USA to keep the Kurds from getting "an uppity-n****r syndrome" and demanding,God forbid,independence or something.
Soon they'll get weird ideas of being called "mister" instead of "hey you" and demand equal rights with the "master race" .What has the world come to when even the Kurds can't be kicked around anymore?
Posted by: El Id   2003-04-10 07:24:44  

#6  Please lets not be too hard on the Turks. On their side they were allies for all the long years of the cold war. They were allies in the Gulf War (and not even their critics admit they were not made whole economically for that) and (even the Iraqi Kurds admit) some of the Turkish Kurds were real terrorists. Against this weighs their relative inability to date to fight internal corruption (I'm told they are giving it a good try now), their brutality in Cyprus, their oppression of the Turkish Kurd population and their failure to face up to the massacres of their Armenian population. In all, much better than most of the world.
Posted by: mhw   2003-04-10 07:09:15  

#5  It shows how wrong America was to trust"Fair-weather friend"Turkey.
Go whine to the French,Murat,at least the French people are starting to realize they screwed the pooch.
Posted by: raptor   2003-04-10 06:37:27  

#4  Murat

Why are Turks so afraid of the Kurds?

Worried that if US troops head north into Turkey they will be greeted as liberators by 40% of the population of Turkey who have been oppressed and brutalized for generations.

Turkey blew its chance to be America's friend in this war. Now the Kurds are doing everything they can to be America's best and most trustworthy friend in the region.

The world has changed! You (Turkey) will have to live with it whether you like it or not.

What is it with Moslem society that their response to every problem is - why are you are conspiring against us!

It still amazes me that Turkey could mis-calculate so badly.

Posted by: Phil B   2003-04-10 05:11:00  

#3  Murat: cypriots kurds armenians
Posted by: anon1   2003-04-10 05:00:07  

#2  It shows only how right Turkey was to distrust the US and the words of Bush and Powell.
Posted by: Murat   2003-04-10 04:53:04  

#1  Uh oh. HEre come the Turks...
Posted by: Ptah   2003-04-10 04:42:26  

00:00