You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
East/Subsaharan Africa
U.N. Official Blasts Liberia's Leader
2003-05-19
The U.N. refugee chief on Sunday blamed Liberia and warlord-turned-president Charles Taylor for the conflicts and refugee crises roiling West Africa and said in unusually blunt terms that Taylor should be forced out. Ruud Lubbers, U.N. High Commissioner for Refugees, also urged the United States to act on what he said was its responsibility toward Liberia, a timber-rich country founded by freed American slaves in the 19th century.
Cheeze. Lubbers actually said something of substance? Wowzers. I'm not too sure where we fit in with Liberia, though, since it was never a U.S. colony, and was actually peaceful and fairly democratic — its government modeled on the U.S. — until about 20 years ago...
Internationally, "Saddam Hussein had more stature than Taylor. (Slobodan) Milosevic did too. But it's too selective" for the world to act against the Iraqi and Yugoslav dictators and do nothing against Taylor, Lubbers said.
Agreed...
"If you're serious about democracy in the rest of the world, then you should be serious about democracy in West Africa as well," the U.N. refugee chief said. "My preference is that one would force Taylor to step down."
Good idea. You make him step down, Ruud...
Lubbers, the former Dutch prime minister, spoke at the end of a five-nation tour visiting the capitals and refugee camps of West Africa. As he closed the trip, Taylor's forces were battling rebels on Liberia's border with Guinea. Liberian Defense Minister Daniel Chea also accused Guinea on Sunday of sending troops directly into Liberia to fight alongside the anti-Taylor forces. Liberia's internal conflicts have displaced 1 million people inside the country, and sent 300,000 fleeing to neighboring nations, including Ivory Coast, itself wracked by a civil war. With pressure on him growing externally and internally, Taylor was a no-show last week for a scheduled meeting with the U.N. official in Monrovia, Liberia's capital. In Taylor's absence, Lubbers bluntly criticized Taylor's officials over the refugee crisis, telling them, "You're killing your own people."
Gosh. That's never happened before. And in West Africa, of all places, too!
Lubbers' words Sunday, and throughout the tour, marked some of the most public and sweeping condemnation of Taylor yet by an international figure. However, the United Nations and rights groups for years have accused Taylor's regime of rights abuses and fomenting instability in the region. Taylor has denied any wrongdoing.
"Nope. Wudn't me."
A former Boston, Mass.-area gas station attendant and U.S. prison escapee, Taylor has led Liberia since 1997, winning elections one year after the end of Liberia's devastating seven-year civil war. Taylor launched that war with a failed coup attempt in 1989.
Posted by:Fred Pruitt

#9  There has to be a confluence of national interests and national security before we militarily intervene anywhere. Funny, though, how a UN official turns into a bloodthirsty warmonger calling for the US to save someone's bacon.

As I recall there are a few other vetoing nations on the "Security Council." Now would be a great time for Russia, China, and France to show their stuff.

Posted by: R. McLeod   2003-05-20 00:27:49  

#8  Luud Rubbers. Take that.
Posted by: Brian   2003-05-20 00:03:46  

#7  Last year we heard a lot about Al Qaeda's profiting from the dirty diamond trade in Liberia and especially Sierra Leone. Is this no longer an issue? If it still is, is it not reason enough for active intervention -- intervention that would bring massive collateral benefits to the people of those two miserable countries?
Posted by: closet neo-con   2003-05-19 19:20:04  

#6  It'd be nice if we paid a little more attention to Latin America and Africa than we do.

Chuck,
IF we pay attention, we're called "interfering", "imperialistic", and "meddlesome". If we don't pay attention, we're called "inattentive", "myopic", and "self-centered". It's a total no-win situation. All we can do is to allow Africa and Latin America to do whatever they wish, until it reaches the point where Americans and American interest are seriously affected. Then it's time to knock heads, run the really NASTY party over the cliff, and pull back again. It'll take doing this ten or twelve times before anybody catches on that their ACTION is why we RESPOND. Eventually, though, even the worst regime will either get the message, or there won't be enough bad guys left to reach critical mass.
Posted by: Old Patriot   2003-05-19 16:43:43  

#5  Maybe they should have stayed in charge? If the limitations on democracy staved of what they've had since the limitations went bye-bye, maybe the tradeoff was worth it? Rule by Tubmans seems to have been somewhat less despotic than rule by Charles Tayler.
Posted by: Fred   2003-05-19 13:19:50  

#4  "peaceful and fairly democratic"

Well unfortunately it was peaceful only cause of the limitations on democracy - it was ruled by americo-liberians (descendants of freed black american slaves) who only made up 3% of the country - when the locals took over, it all went hell.
Posted by: liberalhawk   2003-05-19 12:18:18  

#3  I will *not* make the obvious juke on Ruud Lubbers' name...I will *not* make the obvious juke on Ruud Lubbers' name...I will *not* make the obvious juke on Ruud Lubbers' name...

Nope. Not gonna do it...
Posted by: mojo   2003-05-19 09:48:49  

#2  Since Charles Taylor is obviously a *bad* guy and would be a bad European, why don't they indict him before the majestic International Criminal Court! That'll have him shaking in his boots in no time.
Posted by: Ray   2003-05-19 08:15:08  

#1  It'd be nice if we paid a little more attention to Latin America and Africa than we do. Long term, it could really come back and bite us in the rearend.

And, besides, the French could use another lesson in how to do things right.
Posted by: Chuck   2003-05-19 07:27:20  

00:00