You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
International
Missile shield gains support across globe
2003-05-21
Edited for brevity.
The White House yesterday announced that global opposition to President Bush's missile-defense plan largely has collapsed in the wake of the war against terrorism, causing a "sea change" of views even in nations such as Russia, which once opposed the plan. "We had a lively national debate about missile defense for 20 years," said a senior administration official. "That more or less appears to be settled." Responding to questions from The Washington Times, the official added: "There really has been a sea change."
So much for the denigrating talk of "Star Wars" and the predictions that it'll never work. It's been demonstrated that it does, and if it does and you still leave yourself naked to anything from SCUDs to ICBMs you're not protecting the nation — regardless of which nation you are...
To mark the milestone, the White House last night formally codified its quest for a global missile-defense system in a document known as National Security Policy Directive 23, releasing an unclassified version that spells out the president's vision. "Hostile states, including those that sponsor terrorism, are investing large resources to develop and acquire ballistic missiles of increasing range and sophistication," the document stated. "The United States and our allies lack effective defenses against this threat." To remedy that, the Bush administration is accelerating deployment of the first stages of a missile shield in Alaska that would be able by next year to intercept any missile fired from North Korea. But the shield eventually would be extended to encompass many nations, a large number of which are scrambling to sign up for protection.
Posted by:Dar

#4  The science behind the "midcourse" segment of the defense is murkier than I'd like; the major public sources on it (like the Union of Concerned Scientists) have a well-known bias. Reading between the lines, I think we have a good decade to go before we could deploy a system that we can trust to shoot down ICBMs.
Posted by: Ray   2003-05-22 02:01:25  

#3  "So much for the denigrating talk of "Star Wars"
and the predictions that it'll never work."

It always depended on the threat you were
defending against. Against thousands of
warheads and decoys with fast-boost launchers
from the old USSR--not a chance. They could
trivially overwhelm our detection systems, not
to mention our interceptors. The APS report
was pretty conclusive.

Against a dozen missiles from North Korea
a missile defense might be possible. Not easy,
even so.

Posted by: James   2003-05-21 19:45:52  

#2  Doesn't matter whether Putin likes it or not, missile defense is going to happen at some point. If opposition to missile defense collapsed among other nations, that's fine, but in the event that opposition DIDN'T evaporate, it probably wouldn't factor into the decision to go ahead with a missile defense plan anyway.
Posted by: Bomb-a-rama   2003-05-21 14:12:02  

#1  oh yeah, bush got all huggy with Putin, hes a great guy, he likes missile defense, etc. Then Putin co-leads the axis of weasels. Im still waiting for the white house to explain whats going on in Russia, how it misjudged Putin, and what the implications of that are wrt missile defense (did Putin okay missile defense only cause he had no choice, and secretly decided to undermine us elsewhere) so far the inclination seems to be to blame the French, and claim that its Lukoil driving Russian policy in the Mideast, not Putin.
Posted by: liberalhawk   2003-05-21 09:54:40  

00:00