| Submit your comments on this article |
| International |
| Chirac reopens Iraq wounds |
| 2003-06-03 |
| Panic over, the French want us to cotinue loving to hate 'em... French President Jacques Chirac has made clear he still believes the US-led military action against Iraq was illegitimate, despite backing reconstruction efforts in the wake of a bitter diplomatic spat. At a news conference at the end of the G8 summit France was hosting, Mr Chirac said that any military action not supported by the United Nations Security Council was illegal. He also called for international rules to be respected in a spirit of dialogue and multi-lateralism. His comments followed publication of a final summit declaration in which the leading industrialised nations said their aim was a "fully sovereign, stable and democratic Iraq". Has Chirac been at the Summit Tipple again? Pied dans la Bouche, I think it's called, vintage 2003. The G8 - Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Russia, the UK and US - said they "share the conviction that the time has now come to build peace and to reconstruct Iraq". The three-day summit provided the first opportunity for some of the leaders - notably the US and French presidents - to meet since sharp differences developed over military action in Iraq. BBC diplomatic correspondent Barnaby Mason says that politically, the summit turned into a damage limitation exercise after the divisions over the Iraq war, which was also strongly opposed by Germany and Russia. President George W Bush was not present for the summit's final session on Tuesday, having left the previous day on the Middle Eastern leg of his foreign tour. "We consider that all military action not endorsed by the international community, through, in particular, the Security Council, was both illegitimate and illegal, is illegitimate and illegal. And we have not changed our view on that", Mr Chirac told reporters in Evian. He said he had told President Bush as much when the two men met on Monday - their first face-to-face talks since the US-led invasion of Iraq. Both said the talks had been held in a positive and constructive atmosphere, but although they appeared relaxed, observers said the atmosphere behind the scenes remained prickly. At the end of the summit, our correspondent says, the transatlantic disagreement about Washington's right to take pre-emptive forceful action against alleged threats is still there for everyone to see. Mr Chirac also blamed the Americans for disappointed hopes that the summit could help narrow the gap between rich and poor. They were happy, he said, to see an end to subsidies on European farm produce, but not so happy to end subsidies for their own crops. Can't let an occasion like this pass without the obligatory "America to blame for Global Woes" observation. The summit has been marred by violence in nearby Swiss towns, with thousands of protesters clashing with riot police for a third night in Geneva. Police used tear gas, rubber pellets and water cannon to disperse the demonstrators, who staged a sit-in after refusing to be searched by police. And at the weekend, masked rioters destroyed and looted shops in Geneva before police cleared the streets. The final summit declaration expressed determination to support the latest US efforts to bring peace to the Middle East, and said delegates had discussed the "desirability" of a comprehensive settlement including Syria and Lebanon. It also voiced concern over reports of mounting violence against opposition activists in Zimbabwe, and called on the government of Robert Mugabe to respect the right to peaceful demonstration. Where would we be without platitudes? And in a separate statement issued on Monday, the G8 called global terrorism and the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction "the pre-eminent threat to international security". The world community had to use weapons inspections, export controls "and, if necessary, other measures" to tackle the threat of these weapons, it said. A green light to what some would call "hardball", I believe. Who was supposed to tell the weasels about this?! "We strongly urge North Korea to visibly, verifiably and irreversibly dismantle any nuclear weapons programmes," said the statement. It added that Iran's nuclear programme could also lead to weapons production. |
| Posted by:Bulldog |
| #4 How much longer is this dweeb (Chiraq) going to remain in office? Can he be re-elected? Anyone know? |
| Posted by: RW 2003-06-03 17:03:24 |
| #3 Probably a memo. If that doesn't work, a letter, by Gawd! And if all else fails, they'll hold a meeting. |
| Posted by: Fred 2003-06-03 12:08:28 |
| #2 Update: Chirac's in a flutter over the forceful language re. NKor & Iran (from Ananova) "G8 countries disagree over possible military action The Group of Eight industrial nations has put North Korea and Iran on notice that they will not stand by and let them acquire nuclear weapons. However, there were differences over whether the G8 Summit declaration endorsed the possible use of force. The US alleges Iran is developing a clandestine nuclear weapons program, and has called on Russia to halt cooperation on the construction of the Bushehr nuclear power plant. US officials believe technology from that project could help Iran develop nuclear weapons. Iranian state radio has blamed the US for the G8 summit's warning. Iran denies it is developing nuclear weapons. A senior US official said the United States reads the G8 leaders' declaration as implicitly authorising the use of force against countries that violate international nonproliferation norms. But the G8 leaders insist the summit declaration does not endorse the use of military force, should Iran fail to meet its commitments on the transparency of its nuclear program. French President Jacques Chirac said: "This interpretation seems to be extraordinarily daring. There never was any talk of using force against anyone. "We wish to have with Iran the necessary dialogue so they accept the international constraints of the IAEA which allows the containing the dangerous development of military nuclear technology." Canadian Prime Minister Jean Chretien answered no when asked whether the declaration would allow military action should Iran be shown to be pursuing nuclear weapons. German Chancellor Gerhard Schroeder said that all participants at the summit had ruled out the use of force. And Italy's premier, Silvio Berlusconi, said President Bush told him speculation about a US attack against Iran because of its suspected nuclear programs doesn't have any foundation." Sounds like "..if necessary, other measures" to some sounds like "..if necessary, other ineffectual measures." What does "other measures" imply, in this context, if not ultimately, the use of force?! |
| Posted by: Bulldog 2003-06-03 10:57:30 |
| #1 Meanwhile, out of the other sidde of his mouth: CHIRAC TRIES TO ELBOW IN ON MIDEAST June 3, 2003 -- EVIAN, France - The European Union is considering drawing up a new Middle East "road map" for peace between Israel and its hostile neighbors Syria and Lebanon, French President Jacques Chirac said yesterday. Chirac told journalists that EU foreign-policy chief Javier Solana thought such a move could complement the road map for Israel and the Palestinians set out by the "quartet" of the United States, United Nations, European Union and Russia. "I believe that Mr. Solana, for Europe, has thought about working out a road map for Syria and Lebanon," Chirac said at the Group of Eight summit in Evian. "The quartet's road map hardly mentions this problem," he said. "If there is a war between Israel and the Palestinians, there is also a war between Israel and Syria and Lebanon." Chirac stressed at a news conference that Solana was still considering the idea, which was not a French initiative but one to be proposed by the European Union. |
| Posted by: growler 2003-06-03 10:31:49 |