You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Iraq
No links to Saddam, al-Qaeda pair claim
2003-06-10
I personally doubt that Al-Qaeda had anything more than low level contacts with the Iraqi regime, and certainly less than what they have had with other governments like Afghanistan, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia and even Iran. The Mukhabarat did supposedly have an agent inside the Ansar ul-Islam leadership, which in turn had plenty of links to Al-Qaeda, although strictly speaking it was a seperate organisation. There is also Abu Musab Al-Zarqawi allegedly receiving medical assistance somewhere in Iraq after fleeing Afghanistan, but no context was given as to who gave him this assistance and where, so we might have to wait until he has been captured and interrogated before we find out. I also find it interesting that there were no major terrorist attacks anywhere during the 6 weeks or so of war, and the only Iraqi connected attacks before the war were some minor and mostly ineffective attempts in places like Romania and the Philippines. There were the documents that the Telegraph found that showed connections between Iraq and Bin Ladin in early 1998, although this was before the East Africa bombings.
Al-Qaeda did not work with Saddam Hussein's Iraqi regime, two of the terrorist network's senior leaders have told the CIA, intelligence officials say. Abu Zubaydah, an al-Qaeda planner and recruiter who was captured in March 2002, told interrogators last year that such co-operation had been discussed among the group's leaders, but was rejected by Osama bin Laden. The al-Qaeda chief had vetoed the idea because he did not want to be beholden to Saddam, Zubaydah said. Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, al-Qaeda's chief of operations who was captured in Pakistan on March 1, has also said in a debriefing that the group did not work with Saddam. The Bush Administration has not made these statements public, although it has frequently highlighted intelligence reports supporting its claims of links between Iraq and al-Qaeda as it made its case for war. A CIA spokesman, Bill Harlow, declined to comment on what the two al-Qaeda leaders said. Another senior intelligence official played down their debriefings, saying statements by captured al-Qaeda operatives must be regarded with scepticism.
That's true enough, Zubaydah has certainly lied plenty of times. I would expect that in the coming months the CIA, DIA etc. will be busy translating documents and interviewing former Mukhabarat agents
Posted by:Paul Moloney

#3   Keep in mind that Zarqawi was only in Baghdad in August 2002, which would put Zubaydah out of loop as far as al-Qaeda's leadership is concerned. The claim by Khalid only comes from one debriefing, and if Iraq was their state sponsor he would be certain to deny that like the plague in hopes of protecting an ally. Notice the article doesn't say what Khalid said about confirmed state sponsors like Iran.
Posted by: Dan Darling   2003-06-10 20:17:03  

#2  I don't care if it was tea&crumpets between 2 flunkies you deal with Al Q you die.
Posted by: raptor   2003-06-10 18:50:03  

#1  It makes sense that the emissaries would be low-level, to maintain plausible deniability. But the contacts are likely to be high level - simply because Muslim governments can use al Qaeda as a cat's paw for their policy ends. Muslim countries have been turning a blind eye to al Qaeda fund raising because it was their way of striking at us without being openly at war with us. In fact, having public face-to-face meetings between al Qaeda leaders and Muslim heads of state would defeat the point of what they're doing - bushwhacking us while disowning responsibility.
Posted by: Zhang Fei   2003-06-10 10:32:23  

00:00