You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Iraq
Turban Stirs Up Trouble
2003-07-21
EFL
Until now, interactions between the Americans and the Iraqis in Najaf have been calm, free of the random violence rampant in the country’s Sunni heartland.
Why Moktada isn’t wearing an orange jumpsuit by now is beyond me. Yeah, I know. There’d be a big uprising. But you know what? He’s already instigating a big uprising. Pay the bill now, or pay it later with interest. I don’t think the people who hang out with al Sadr really care about the case that we’re no doubt putting together against him right now.
But a sudden storm erupted on Saturday after Moktada al-Sadr, the scion of a clan of beloved clerics and the most vocal supporter of Iranian-style theocracy in Iraq, asserted that American forces were encircling his home. They were bent on arresting him, his aides announced, after an incendiary sermon on Friday in which he rejected the American-appointed Governing Council and called for the formation of an Islamic army.
Posted by:11A5S

#11  Shit - not getting refreshed. I missed your comments, Paul, when writing mine.

You called it - very accurate. Regards leadership, I was RA and we had good ones - and really really bad ones.

A comment on this from SOG475 (I think that's right) indicated he wishes he'd had such professional soldiers to lead - and I certainly understand him and sympathize. When I was in, 90% were just passing time and ducking everything they could - and that includes officers. Not a Pro in sight, most of the time. Butter Bar guys were dangerous if they had ambition - not taught to listen to the NCO's back then.

Now it's obviously much much better, but the Army probably does lag behind. Totaly asinine interservice rivalry is one of the remaining problems.
Posted by: PD   2003-7-21 10:01:47 PM  

#10  It's all about leadership - real leadership, not the tripe they "teach" in corporate team-building workshops.

Raptor's got it right - LtCol Conlin is the real deal. And real soldiers will follow the right guy through anything you can throw at them. Some command and some demand. Conlin commands. His guys know they'll be proud to have been there. And seeing it done right when the heat's on will create a couple of new leaders from his outfit, too. Nothing teaches as well as experience and positive real-world examples.
Posted by: PD   2003-7-21 6:54:13 PM  

#9   BJD >>> I wasn't advocating a massacre. The point was that the Marines don't play politics. When they're on the scene THEY'RE in charge. I don't doubt for a second that the order for fix bayonets was given. They wouldn't back down, period.

I also agree that Army units have cojones as well. Believe me they do. Unfortunately, in the last war I only saw them on the enlisted side.

To compare the Marine and Army officer is like comparing apples to coconuts. I've worked with both in real world situations. There IS a difference. It's sad to say that and only more frustrating because it doesn't have to be that way.

Just look at the difference in the ROE for the soldiers and Marines. Typical of the Army treating the soldiers like irresponsible kids. We had the same dumb A** ROE the first time. It was ridiculous.

That's why you don't hear about Marine causalties on a daily basis. There's a common phrase in the Army. "The way you train is the way you fight." Never have words more true ever been spoken. Sometimes with tragic results.

It too doesn't have to be that way either.
Posted by: Paul   2003-7-21 6:27:57 PM  

#8  "Much to my dissapointment, the Army politicians officers didn't have the nuts guts to make that type of decision even at the 0-4 grade and higher (Major and above) It hurts to say it, but God I love those Jarheads!!!"

Gotta love Marines, sure, but I'd say 3rd ID's 3-7 CAV could give lessons in cojones. Suppressing the Saddam thugs takes brains too. Opening fire on a crowd formed to absorb a few score 5.56 is a recipe for getting a lot of people mad who were previously accepting of our presence. As strategypage notes, our special ops guys are quietly fighting this war at night away from the TV weenies. We will win this. Just don't screw it up by going postal on the locals.

Check out this for some discussion of provoking a massacre. Shoot, we still bitch about the Boston Massacre, don't we?
Posted by: BJD (The Dignified Rant)   2003-7-21 4:13:55 PM  

#7   That's the wonderful thing about the Marines...when they say MOVE, you jump, crawl move,scoot,skip, etc. just to make sure you cover all of the bases.

In Cuba (1994) the riot rundown went like this. If the riot got out of control or the resistance to the Marine frontline riot line became stiif they simply called out a word "Lightning" (for example). The riot line would immediately break back a few steps break right and left and then back behind the RIFLEMEN (Smile). The riflemen were already on a knee locked and loaded. On the command to fire end game for the bad guys. Us Army guys would then fill the body bags.

Fortunately for the Cubans, they had learned early on that the Marines don't bluff.

Much to my dissapointment, the Army politicians officers didn't have the nuts guts to make that type of decision even at the 0-4 grade and higher (Major and above) It hurts to say it, but God I love those Jarheads!!!
Posted by: Paul   2003-7-21 3:42:49 PM  

#6  Dave,

Read that post at Tacitus, as well. I feel it wasn't just the Marines, it was the command their officer issued..."Fix Bayonets!" seems to work real well with the sand fleas.
Posted by: Hodadenon   2003-7-21 2:12:53 PM  

#5  I disagree with giving this guy the attention he craves. He's claiming he's dangerous and the Americans want to stifle him, and there's no sense in giving him undeserved credibility.

Two dozen Marines and a colonel with a loud speaker were enough for the demonstrators to back down. They could have called in reinforcements, surrounded Al Sadr and took him into custody, and that would have only shown his supporters his claims were true.

Let him keep crying wolf--the crowd will figure it out. Judging from the comments in the story, most of them already have.
Posted by: Dar   2003-7-21 2:07:29 PM  

#4  This mook's lookin' like a black bag special more and more every day...
Posted by: mojo   2003-7-21 10:37:28 AM  

#3  "called for the formation of an Islamic army"
That should be enough to arrest his ass.

Way-to-go,Colonel.You da man!
Posted by: raptor   2003-7-21 7:36:39 AM  

#2  Interesting take on this over at Tacitus.


"LTC Christopher C. Conlin, refused to back down before Sadr's demonstration, eventually compelling an angry crowd of thousands to disperse with only two dozen Marines and a show of resolution. Did I say this was bad news? As I write, it seems more like good news. A major Shi'a leader has declared himself in opposition, made his move, failed to catch fire beyond his narrow base, and had his demonstration thwarted by a handful of Americans. One can't draw too many lessons from the events of a single day, but we can say that the day ended well."
Posted by: Dave   2003-7-21 12:56:51 AM  

#1  He's inviting arrest; we ought to give him what he wants. He'd look good in orange.
Posted by: Steve White   2003-7-21 12:50:01 AM  

00:01