You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Down Under
Australia Withheld Info on Illegal Combatant Terror Suspect
2003-07-21
Australia’s government refused to release information on a terror suspect held by the United States for fear of harming relations with Washington, the defense minister said Monday. The Australian newspaper filed a Freedom of Information request with the government for details on the legality of David Hicks’ detention but was denied. Hicks, 27, was allegedly captured fighting with the Taliban in Afghanistan and has been imprisoned without charge at Guantanamo Bay for 18 months. Defense Minister Robert Hill said the government can refuse a Freedom of Information request if it could harm Australia’s relationship with a foreign government. ``As I understand it, that’s one of the reasons why the application has been declined,’’ Hill told Australian Broadcasting Corporation radio. Australia has been one of Washington’s closest allies since long before the Sept. 11, 2001, terror attacks, sending troops to the U.S.-led wars in Afghanistan and Iraq.

Australian officials have said they are satisfied with the legal process followed by the U.S. military in regard to Hicks and a second Australian — Mamdouh Habib, 46 — arrested last year in Pakistan for allegedly training with al-Qaida and also held at the U.S. base in Cuba. However, the government is under pressure from opposition parties, church and human rights groups to lodge a stronger protest with Washington. The United States agreed last week to temporarily suspend legal action against Hicks and two British citizens held at Guantanamo Bay. The three were among six men set to face military tribunals as ``enemy combatants’’ against the United States.
Brit trials will move forward soon. Wonder if Hicks will follow shortly thereafter?
Posted by:Steve White

#4  He wanted Australian law, he bloody well should have stayed in Australia. Ditto for the 2 from Britain.
Posted by: mojo   2003-7-21 6:21:03 PM  

#3  Those people are already doing that. Don't release Hicks to us - he cannot be charged under any Australian law that was in force at the time he was captured and those who are calling for him to be tried in Australia know this. Keep the creep! Unfortunately he has aleady managed to breed.
Posted by: Aussie Mike   2003-7-21 5:58:36 PM  

#2  You know what I'd do? Release Hicks into the custody of Australian authorities and have him taken home just to see if those "opposition parties, church and human rights groups" in Oz try to absolve the creep of any responsibility for his actions.
Posted by: Bomb-a-rama   2003-7-21 10:49:00 AM  

#1  All these phony human rights groups like to focus on is our treatment of prisoners at Gitmo. Not a bloody peep is heard on behalf of the victims of terrorism. Terrorists do not subscribe to the Geneva Convention, so they are not covered by it. These groups need to be told FOAD and they need to be told in Voice of America Special English that they are phonies and hypocrates, and that they are aiding and abetting terrorists. Like Frank G sez in a recent post that we need to see more video of the horrors of 9-11 so we all remember. That was a free intro into what could really happen to alot more of us if we let the Gitmo Guys loose.
Posted by: Alaska Paul   2003-7-21 2:21:08 AM  

00:00