You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
-Short Attention Span Theater-
Y bother: men are doomed after all
2003-08-19
Edited For Length
MEN are doomed to extinction, victims of the decaying human Y-chromosome, the only piece of DNA men possess and women do not.
Yikes! Er, Y-yikes!
So says Bryan Sykes, professor of human genetics at Oxford University, in a book that envisages the "Sapphic reproduction" of women by genetic manipulation. A "genetic ruin littered with molecular damage", the Y-chromosome cannot repair itself, nor arrest the steadily accumulating damage, he reports in Adam’s Curse. "Like the face of the moon, still pitted by all the craters from all the meteors that have ever fallen onto its surface, Y-chromosomes cannot heal their own scars. It is a dying chromosome and one day it will become extinct."
That's why there aren't any male lizards or marmosets or spiders, y'know. All their Y chromosomes fell out and there's nothing left but the female of the species. It's a scientific fact. You could look it up somewhere.
The decline of the Y-chromosome has been well chronicled. What is new is Professor Sykes’s description of the implications and the stark choices for the human race. He says that because the chromosome’s main function is switching on male embryos in the womb, its demise means the final curtain for men. By his estimate, the male will go belly-up in about 125,000 years.
That does it! I'm leaving!
"From the genetic point of view, very little stands in its way," he says. His strategy for perpetuating a new female race depends on tweaking the proven technique of injecting sperm into eggs. Instead, the nucleus from a second egg would be injected. The only difference from any other birth would be that the baby would always be a girl. "The entire process has been accomplished without sperm, without Y-chromosomes and without men," Professor Sykes says.
"'Cuz they're ucky anyway..."
The girls would not be clones, but would comprise the same mixture of their parents’ genes, shuffled by recombination, as today’s children. But there would be one major difference: both parents would be women.
So would their uncles. Monkeys' uncles are all women, y'know. That's 'cuz all those Y chromosomes fell out. They just litter the landscape all over the African savannah. When you walk, monkey chromosomes crunch underfoot. There's places in the heart of the steamy jungle where no trees grow because there's so many used chromosomes stacked up.
It is almost bound to happen, says the professor, who can find no moral objection. "Men are now on notice," he says.
"Moral objection? Why would I find one of those? I'm a perfessor..."
However, Professor Sykes does not speculate on what would pass for sex once men disappear.
Well, judging from this the Australian government has some creative solutions!
Posted by:Secret Master

#10  Prolly why SETI hasn't heard from anyone...
Posted by: .com   2003-8-19 11:15:03 PM  

#9  monkey's uncles? hahahahaha! But where is the Coffee Alert? I am now wearing a cup! oh that was hot!

What I want to know is with all this genetic technology, why we are just going to sit around for 125000years and let men dissappear. Not enough time to come up with a solution? Or is this another FCC (Feminist Chromazonal Conspiracy) issue?

Next time my wife claims I'm not listening, I'll just blame it on the Y.

Posted by: john   2003-8-19 10:33:26 PM  

#8  Has he set a date? I'd like to plan ahead.
Posted by: tu3031   2003-8-19 9:12:32 PM  

#7  Better put us guys on the endangered species-- er, endangered genders list right now. I'm gonna get me some sweet government subsidy on account of my suicidal chromos.
Posted by: (lowercase) matt   2003-8-19 8:48:39 PM  

#6  So that's what happened to the dinosaurs.
Posted by: Stephen   2003-8-19 8:07:01 PM  

#5  There's something very fishy about this article. Don't other mammals share similar characteristics with humans? And yet I have yet to hear of other mammals not having any male offspring.
Posted by: Zhang Fei   2003-8-19 6:22:30 PM  

#4  Er, that "Y-chromosome cannot repair itself" bit flies against what I've read. As I understand it, the Y-chromosome has its own internal repair mechanism that can stich it back together in case of damage.

http://newsblaster.cs.columbia.edu/archives/2003-06-19-09-36-19/web/summaries/2003-06-19-09-40-36-077.html

That was published in Nature a few months back. Any researchers out there know what a coup it is to get an article published in Nature - well, this one made the cover!
Posted by: Crescend   2003-8-19 6:06:54 PM  

#3  And yet sexual reproduction has been around for how long, exactly?

Sounds to me like the professor's taken a ride on the Nutbar Express.
Posted by: Robert Crawford   2003-8-19 6:05:07 PM  

#2  "heal"? "dying"? A "genetic ruin"?

OOOOOOH! IT'S CHANGING!

This is a geneticist? Ever hear of mutation, pal? Evolution?

Any of this ring a bell?
Posted by: mojo   2003-8-19 5:53:36 PM  

#1  Ahhh! I thought it was a simple request in my divorce decree...why not give it to her...Yikes, indeed!
Posted by: Frank G   2003-8-19 5:01:44 PM  

00:00