You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
India-Pakistan
Musharraf’s army breaking ranks
2003-08-29
From Asia Times, EFL:
Well-placed sources within the army have revealed to Asia Times Online that recently several top officers have been arrested. These arrests have been kept secret as no charges have been laid. The officers, according to the sources, were seized after being fingered by agents of the US Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) as probably having links with international Islamic militants. The FBI has been given a free hand to interrogate the officers at its cell in the capital, Islamabad, or at any other location of its choosing in order to establish ties between the officers and militant networks.
Asia Times Online investigations have established the names of two of those arrested: Assistant Adjutant-General and Quartermaster-General, Lieutenant-Colonel Khalid Abbassi (posted in Kohat, North-West Frontier Province) and one Major Atta. The investigations show that neither the family of the officers nor their subordinates know where they are being detained. Senior officers in the army, when contacted by this correspondent, remained tight lipped and their advice was, "stay away from this matter". Further investigations reveal that Abbassi is a widely-respected officer in signals, and that he is also a very religious person. Apparently, he delivered lessons from the Koran every day to his junior officers, a trend that was encouraged by former dictator General Zia ul-Haq in the army, and which is still common nowadays.
The Pakistani army, largely through the Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI), as part of its strategic vision for the region actively supported and promoted the Taliban in its formation and ultimate seizure of power in Afghanistan in 1996.
It is an open secret in Washington now that a delegation of senior Pakistani army officers, sent to Afghanistan prior to the US invasion ostensibly to convince the Taliban to step down, actually spent their time instructing the Taliban on how to protect their weapons from the impending US aerial bombing.
With the rapid retreat of the Taliban from Afghanistan, though, and in the face of tough Washington pressure to join in the global "war on terror", Musharraf had little choice but to throw in his hat as an ally of the US. This had two immediate effects: it disenchanted a large section of the military-security apparatus, and it paved the way for US intelligence to muscle into internal Pakistani affairs, which further upset those within the military-security establishment.
I’ll bet.
Initially, the FBI was allowed to set up small cells in the operations offices of the ISI, and ISI officials were attached to these cells. However, the FBI was able to decide on its own targets, and it delegated specific assignments to ISI officials, but under FBI surveillance. Lately, the FBI has been given separate premises all over the country, and its own separate teams of officers, who, with the best bugging devices in the world, now have maximum access to Pakistan’s telecommunications system.
Which explains how they can find and grab suspects.
This kind of access means that the FBI is now privy to much of the information that the Pakistan army has, which has led to the Americans being able to nip in the bud a number of attempts by the ISI to re-establish its presence in Afghanistan through local commanders of the Hezb-I-Islami of warlord Gulbuddin Hekmatyar, now a key player in the Afghan resistance movement.
Kind of suprising we haven’t heard of any FBI agents getting wacked.
When General Zia ul-Haq was president and the chief of army staff in the late 1970s and early 1980s, he encouraged his officers to say their prayers five times a day (as is customary in Muslim society), and those who did so were looked on favorably when promotion time came around. Indeed, it became essential that anyone seeking a top position in the army or the ISI displayed the appropriate religious fervor. Even better would be if an officer had a background in the Islami Jamiat-i-Talaba (the student wing of the Jamaat-i-Islami, the premier fundamentalist party). Such a connection led to the emergence of the likes of Lieutenant-General Hameed Gul, Brigadier Imtiaz and dozens of others who made their names in political operations in favor of Islamic parties or in launching conspiracies to unseat secular parties, such as the Pakistan People’s Party of twice premier Benazir Bhutto.
But times have changed. After taking over from Sharif, Musharraf placed a team of religious zealots in all prominent positions. Now he is reversing that trend and is ditching many stalwarts in favor of new, more flexible, faces - faces that are presumably more acceptable to the US. This has not been without severe backlash. Three known assassination plots have been hatched against the general, but he has remained undeterred; in fact, moves to rid the services of religious-minded officers have gathered pace, and many have been given their marching orders or passed over for promotion.
It is no coincidence, then, that the Jamaat-i-Islami is championing, with grim determination, a drive to have Musharraf step down as head of the army. With its historically close connections to so many within the forces, Jamaat’s move can only be seen as a signal from within the now bitterly divided armed forces. And the latest news of Musharraf’s willingness to send 10,000 troops to northern Iraq (the Kurdish regions only) further aggravates the situation, as this is strongly opposed by many within the army who foresee Pakistanis as being used as cannon fodder by the US. The actual departure of the troops, then, could be the final straw for Musharraf, who has earned vengeful and powerful enemies in uniforms as a result of forcing the army to march to his own beat.
Musharraf has to do a Stalin style purge of the hard-line islamic elements in his armed forces, or he’s toast.
Posted by:Steve

#6  Asia Times is about as serious a news source as Debka.They just make this stuff up.
Posted by: El Id   2003-8-29 5:10:54 PM  

#5  This is more garbage from the fantasists at Asia Times. If the FBI had the kind of cooperation from Pakistan that this guy claims we have, terrorists would not be mounting cross-border raids into Afghanistan. These guys are just making excuses for Hektamayar's failure to get anything accomplished in Afghanistan except get new Taliban recruits killed in large numbers. What these pro-Taliban members of Pakistan security forces don't realize is that when roused, Uncle Sam is an extremely dangerous opponent.

If you read the anti-American newswires, you get the impression that US forces are extremely incompetent, so the Pakistani theory is that betrayal by Musharraf accounts for the failure of the neo-Talibanis. Of course, the truth is newswire reporters are incompetent and anti-American, whereas our boys are taking it to the enemy and inflicting considerable damage. But anti-American wing of the Pakistani security forces will never recognize this truth, so they resort to the theory that Musharraf is an American puppet. (I wish).
Posted by: Zhang Fei   2003-8-29 4:16:15 PM  

#4  I would like to think Musharraf would do a South Africa and get rid of the nukes before his country fell. I would like to think so but I realize that's wishfull thinking.
Posted by: Yank   2003-8-29 3:34:56 PM  

#3  Yet another reason to get rid of nukes.
Posted by: Mr. Davis   2003-8-29 12:43:05 PM  

#2  If it comes apart, as Yank suggests, who ends up with the nukes? We could easily end up with nuclear armed militant Islamics in this scenario.
Posted by: Dakotah   2003-8-29 12:05:54 PM  

#1  I don't see Pakistan surving the next decade. Baluchi's, Pashtuns, Punjabi's. Eventually the instability will shatter it into three seperate nations.

The question is, do the Baluchi's join up with the Baluchi's in Iran, the Pashtuns join up with the Pashtun's in Afghanistan, and the Punjabi's join up with the Punjabi's in India, or does the fragmentation cause independence-minded thinking in the neighborhood and further destabilize everything.
Posted by: Yank   2003-8-29 11:27:26 AM  

00:00