You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Afghanistan
Pakistan to Close Refugee Camps Near Afghan Border
2003-08-30
Afghanistan, Pakistan and the UN refugee agency will close four refugees camps near the border and relocate or repatriate some 50,000 Afghans residing there, officials said yesterday after a two-day meeting in Kabul. Afghanistan’s Deputy Minister of Refugees and Repatriation Mohammad Naeem Ghiacy told reporters Kabul, Islamabad and the UNHCR agreed that the number of camps close to the border should be reduced for a lack of proper facilities.
Couldn't have anything to do with the Afghans bitching about them being chock full of Taliban, could it?
Two camps in the Chaman area of Balochistan province bordering southern Afghanistan and the two Shalman camps on the Khyber Pass in North West Frontier Province established after the US-led assault to topple the Taleban regime would be closed. Hasim Utkan, head of UNHCR operations in Pakistan, said 50,000 people will be affected by the camps’ closures. “But since we are in a voluntary repatriation mode it’s either repatriation or relocation,” he said.
I doubt if they'll repatriate. That could cut them off from their ammunition resupply lines...
He said the camps had been established as close as five kilometers to the border in the emergency situation following the fall of the Taleban. “This is not in line with international principles; camps have to be at a certain distance from the border and something which is acceptable in an emergency situation is more difficult to accept” two years later, he said. UNHCR coordinator for refugee repatriation Salvatore Lombardo said the process of closing the camps would begin in February 2004.
The sooner, the better, I'd say...
“Refugees would be offered two options, either assistance to return to Afghanistan or relocation to another camp where they would continue to be offered assistance by the UNHCR,” he told AFP. He said the four affected camps were unsatisfactory both in terms of security and quality of life, as even water must be trucked in to some of the camps. Some 200 refugee camps dot the Pakistani landscape.
Posted by:Fred Pruitt

#5  I hope we relocate them to the big red X

You know, the one that's several miles in diameter and in the middle of the desert. No mountains blocking the bombers peoples view, it would be perfect!
Posted by: Charles   2003-8-30 1:48:31 PM  

#4  I look into the crystal ball and see truck convoys that should be wiped out.
Posted by: tu3031   2003-8-30 10:30:23 AM  

#3  Where are they going to be relocated?

back to the Madrassahs and Soddy for more indoctrination?
Posted by: Frank G   2003-8-30 10:04:07 AM  

#2  Where are they going to be relocated?
If they move into Afganastan,that's good.Put all your eggs in one basket and watch that basket.
If moved farther from the border into Pakistan would make for a more secure"Al Quedda" (translation:base camp,if I remember)

Posted by: raptor   2003-8-30 7:06:36 AM  

#1  Well, if the closure of the camps does have something "to do with the Afghans bitching about them being chock full of Taliban"-- that's a good thing, isn't it? Maybe just another small sign that the Perv Regime is being forced to "get it"? And if the UN guys are also with the closures, that's a good sign too, it seems to me. It suggests that they "get" that the U.S. is not about to tolerate the creation of UN-sponsored breeding grounds of fanatacism to threaten Afghanistan a la the so-called "refugee camps" that threaten Israel.

Funny how a well-applied two-by-four seems to clear some jackass minds...

Posted by: TPF   2003-8-30 3:38:45 AM  

00:00